Contents:
If even one accident can be prevented on reading this book — then the purpose and intent of the book will have been achieved! This eye-opening book emphasizes the importance of road safety and careful driving through a collection of real-life stories from accident victims who share the hard experiences and lessons they learned in order to better educate drivers everywhere. A vital read for anyone behind the wheel, this priceless book has the ability to save lives. Being the Safe Driver! The New Road Safety Novel! Whether an accident results in injury, property loss, or simply a shaken emotional self, reckless driving always has consequences.
Being the Safe Driver! The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety proposes restrictions for new drivers, [57] including a " curfew " imposed on young drivers to prevent them driving at night, an experienced supervisor to chaperone the less experienced driver, forbidding the carrying of passengers, zero alcohol tolerance, raising the standards required for driving instructors and improving the driving test, vehicle restrictions e. Truck drivers indicate that they are parked by putting their cab seat behind their truck [ citation needed ]. In addition to voice calling , activities such as texting while driving , web browsing , playing video games , or phone use in general can also increase the risk of an accident. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Archived from the original PDF on February 15,
From horrible injuries to destroyed families, this enlightening book does a fantastic job of giving all readers reasons to become safe drivers. Already being lauded as one of the most important books to come out this year - Behind the Wheel! Back Cover Text The Sultanate of Oman has the highest number of automobile accidents and casualties in the world.
With such rampant and reckless automobile behaviors on the rise, there has never been a better time to change the culture and safety of our roads. With this groundbreaking new book, drivers across the nation will finally have proof in hand as to why they should drive safer.
Filled with heartbreaking and emotional true stories, this illuminating book shows drivers everywhere the dangers of the road and the true cost of negligence. An invaluable road safety tool, this work can save lives all across the country.
This eye-opening book by Author Majid Al Suleimany emphasizes the importance of road safety and careful driving through a collection of real-life stories from accident victims who share the hard experiences and lessons they learned in order to better educate drivers everywhere. Read more Read less. And A Cry For Help! And At My Workplace! The three books are — Between Us Only! Also At My Workplace! He had started writing in the column now for the past eight years, and his columns appear every Sundays and Wednesdays of the week.
He writes still in The Observer. He started writing as a hobby when he was 14 years old, and his first project in writing My Most Vivid Dream had won him a National Award in a country outside Oman. In a number of cases it has been shown that bans on mobile use while driving have proven to be an effective way to deter people from picking up their phones. Those violating the ban usually face fines and points on their licence.
In the UK using a mobile phone while driving has been illegal since , unless it is in a handsfree kit. The fine increase was not at all effective at stopping motorists from using their phones while driving. Possibly the most important factor was the increasing lack of enforcement of the ban by the police. Both increased smartphone sales and lack of enforcement created a situation where in which it was acceptable to use your phone while driving again, yet having being illegal for over 13 years.
The biggest detriment would be for newly qualified drivers who have passed their driving tests within the last two years. The scientific literature is mixed on the dangers of talking on a cell phone versus those of talking with a passenger. The common conception is that passengers are able to better regulate conversation based on the perceived level of danger, therefore the risk is negligible.
Measurement of attention levels showed that subjects were four times more distracted while preparing to speak or speaking than when they were listening. The number of questions asked averaged slightly higher for mobile phone conversations, although results were not constant across road types and largely influenced by a large number of questions on the urban roads. A simulation study that compared passenger and cell-phone conversations concluded that the driver performs better when conversing with a passenger because the traffic and driving task become part of the conversation.
Drivers holding conversations on cell phones were four times more likely to miss the highway exit than those with passengers, and drivers conversing with passengers showed no statistically significant difference from lone drivers in the simulator.
In contrast, the University of Illinois meta-analysis concluded that passenger conversations were just as costly to driving performance as cell phone ones. It concluded that drivers' training should address the hazards of both mobile phone and passenger conversations. The scientific literature on the dangers of driving while sending a text message from a mobile phone, or texting while driving , is limited. A simulation study at the Monash University Accident Research Centre has provided strong evidence that both retrieving and, in particular, sending text messages has a detrimental effect on a number of critical driving tasks.
Specifically, negative effects were seen in detecting and responding correctly to road signs, detecting hazards, time spent with eyes off the road, and only for sending text messages lateral position. Surprisingly, mean speed, speed variability, lateral position when receiving text messages, and following distance showed no difference.
The low number of scientific studies may be indicative of a general assumption that if talking on a mobile phone increases risk, then texting also increases risk, and probably more so. Texting while driving received greater attention in the late s, corresponding to a rise in the number of text messages being sent. Over a year approximately 2, teens die from texting while driving. Investigations revealed that the engineer of that train had sent 45 text messages while operating.
Two studies, comprising about long-haul trucks driving 3 million combined miles, used video cameras to observe the drivers and road; researchers observed "4, safety-critical events, which includes crashes, near crashes, crash-relevant conflicts, and unintended lane deviations. Text messaging had the greatest relative risk , with drivers being 23 times more likely to experience a safety-critical event when texting.
The study also found that drivers typically take their eyes off the forward roadway for an average of four out of six seconds when texting, and an average of 4. In it was reported that, according to a national survey in the US, the number of drivers who reported using their cellphones to access the internet while driving had risen to nearly one of four. A study conducted by the University of Vienna using the theory of planned behavior identified two key determinants of high-level mobile phone use.
Those two factors, subjective norm i. Mobile phone use while driving has economic impacts. Using a mobile phone while driving can definitely have economic costs to the driver using the phone ex. More interesting however is how a driver's mobile phone use while driving can have external effects on both other drivers' safety and other drivers' economic property. Specifically, mobile phone use while driving produces negative consumption externalities where the consumer's driver's use of the phone while driving can reduce the well-being of others who are not paid by the consumer i.
Mobile phone use can cause drivers to take their eyes off the road, minds off the road, and hands off the steering wheel. The negative consumption externalities produced from mobile phone use while driving not only affects others on the road but also causes economic inefficiencies. Externalities are a form of market failure where, by definition, the market fails to deliver an efficient outcome. Figure 1 details the effects of this negative externality. In this case, the market quantity is too high where there are too many that use their mobile phone while driving.
To overcome this inefficiency, governments often must get involved and regulate price or quantity. While there is no feasible way to ensure that driver's attention remains sufficiently focused on driving, there are ways that the government can intervene legislatively to discourage drivers from engaging in behaviors that potentially distract them from driving. An illustration of this intervention can be found below Figure 2 where, in this case, the government has the ability to fine or ticket those who use a phone while driving in order to reduce the quantity of distracted drivers on the road.
As illustrated, the market quantity Q of distracted driver's produced by mobile phone use while driving is too high and the socially optimal point for society is lower. The negative consumption externalities caused by mobile phone use while driving, as shown, has economic costs. Not only does mobile phone use while driving jeopardize safety for the driver, anyone in the car, or others on the road but it also produces economic costs to all parties involved.
As shown, these costs are best managed with government intervention through policy or legislation changes. Ticketing is often the best choice as it affects only those who are caught performing the illegal act. Ticketing is another cost induced from mobile phone use and driving because ticketing laws for this act have only been put into place due to the large number of accidents caused by distracted drivers due to mobile phone use. Further, not only are the tickets costly to individuals who receive them but so is the price that must be paid to enforce the prohibition of mobile phone use while driving.
Key to the success of a legislative measure is the ability to maintain and sustain them through enforcement or the perception of enforcement. While paying tickets may be an undesired cost to pay by those who are given the ticket, ticket payments can actually have positive impacts in reducing the externality discussed above and increasing the total welfare of society.
Ticket revenue often goes to state or local needs. The effects of ticketing this negative consumption externality of mobile phone use while driving can be seen below. The graph shows the implementation of a ticket as having the same effect of a pigouvian tax. While this is the goal of the ticket, that is, to have the same effect of a pigouvian tax which is intended to correct an inefficient market outcome, and does so by being set equal to the social cost of the negative externalities, that us usually not the case of a ticket.
Tickets only affect those who receive the ticket while a tax effects all. The graphs shows ticket implementation as having the same effect as a pigouvian tax. This is the ideal revenue brought in by ticketing as that is the price burden that will bring the socially optimal quantity.
While this is ideal, this is very unlikely to happen through ticketing because, with ticketing, one must factor in the probability of someone receiving the ticket and multiple that probability by the price. The graph does not show this theoretical situation because the data of how often tickets are given for mobile phone use while driving is not conclusive.
While ticketing can be tricky to apply, the revenue brought in by ticket is a benefit to society as it can be used for local and state needs and will help reduce the externality.
Accidents involving a driver being distracted by talking on a mobile phone have begun to be prosecuted as negligence similar to speeding. New Zealand has banned hand held cellphone use since 1 November Many states in the United States have banned texting on cell phones while driving. Illinois became the 17th American state to enforce this law. This database of laws provides a comprehensive view of the provisions of laws that restrict the use of mobile communication devices while driving for all 50 states and the District of Columbia between , when first law was passed, through December 1, The dataset contains information on 22 dichotomous, continuous or categorical variables including, for example, activities regulated e.
NSW road rules were changed on 1 December for P2 drivers. Learner, P1 and P2 drivers must not use mobile phones for any function while driving or riding or while stationary at traffic lights. You must be parked out of traffic to use your phone. Prior to the introduction of this new law on 1 December , only learner and P1 provisional licence-holders were barred from using mobile phones in any capacity while driving, as P2 drivers faced the same restrictions as other licence-holders. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. June Learn how and when to remove this template message. One can use after parking on safe place. The city of Fort Smith has a blanket ban.
The New England Journal of Medicine. University of Utah Department of Psychology. Archived from the original PDF on Archived from the original PDF on February 16, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Archived from the original PDF on April 14, Driver distraction and crashes: