Contents:
The national parliaments of EU member states have an "early warning mechanism" whereby if one third raise an objection — a "yellow card" — on the basis that the principle of subsidiarity has been violated, then the proposal must be reviewed. If a majority do so — an "orange card" — then the Council or Parliament can vote it down immediately.
If the logistical problems of putting this into practice are overcome, then the power of the national parliaments could be decried as an extra legislature, without a common debate or physical location: The ordinary legislative procedure [4] is the main legislative procedure by which directives and regulations are adopted. It was formerly known as the codecision procedure, and is sometimes referred to as the community method as a contrast to the intergovernmental methods which can variously refer to the consultation procedure or to the open method of co-ordination.
Article TFEU [7] outlines ordinary legislative procedure in the following manner. The Commission submits a legislative proposal to the Parliament and Council. At the first reading Parliament adopts its position. If the Council approves the Parliament's wording then the act is adopted. If not, it shall adopt its own position and pass it back to Parliament with explanations. The Commission also informs Parliament of its position on the matter. At the second reading, the act is adopted if Parliament approves the Council's text or fails to take a decision.
The Parliament may reject the Council's text, leading to a failure of the law, or modify it and pass it back to the Council. The Commission gives its opinion once more. Where the Commission has rejected amendments in its opinion, the Council must act unanimously rather than by majority.
If, within three months of receiving Parliament's new text, the Council approves it, then it is adopted. If it does not, the Council President, with the agreement of the Parliament President, convenes the Conciliation Committee composed of the Council and an equal number of MEPs with the attendance as moderator of the Commission. The committee draws up a joint text on the basis of the two positions. If within six weeks it fails to agree a common text, then the act has failed.
If a majority do so — an "orange card" — then the Council or Parliament can vote it down immediately. More information on the ordinary legislative procedure. As a legislative procedure, it is to be used also when new legislation on combating discrimination is being adopted and it now gives the European Parliament a veto also when the subsidiary general legal basis is applied in line with Article TFEU. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Information is transmitted to Senators, colleagues from the EU Unit and other employees of the Chancellery of the Senate via reports of the representative.
If it succeeds and the committee approves the text, then the Council and Parliament acting by majority must then approve said text third reading. If either fails to do so, the act is not adopted. The procedure was introduced with the Maastricht Treaty as the codecision procedure [8] and was initially intended to replace the Cooperation procedure see below. The codecision procedure was amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam [9] and the number of legal bases where the procedure applies was greatly increased by both the latter treaty and the Treaty of Nice.
It was renamed the ordinary legislative procedure and extended to nearly all areas such as agriculture , fisheries , transport, structural funds, the entire budget and the former third pillar by the Treaty of Lisbon. The trilogue is an informal type of meeting used in the EU's ordinary legislative procedure.
The trilogues are equally tripartite meetings, although the EC operates as a mediator between the EP and the Council. The trilogue negotiations aim at bringing the three institutions to an agreement, in order to fast-track the ordinary legislative procedure. The expression "formal trilogue" is sometimes used to describe meetings of the Conciliation Committee, [10] which take place between the second and the third reading of a legislative proposal.
However the term trilogue is mostly referred to interinstitutional informal negotiations [11] that can take place in any stage of the ordinary legislative procedure, from the first stage to the stage of the formal conciliation procedure. Trilogues have been "formalised" in [13] in a joint declaration of the EP, the Council and the EC [14] but they are not regulated by primary legislation. The evolution of the European integration process, together with the evolution of EP's role as co-legislator have produced an increase in the number of the trilogue meetings.
This trend corresponds to an increase in the number of trilogues over in the same period [16] and it is seen as a proof of the effectiveness of the trilogues in fast tracking the legislative procedure. The principal tool used in trilogues is the four column document, a working sheet divided in four sections, each of them comprising the positions of the three EU institutions. The first column is dedicated to the position of the EC, the second one to the position of the EP, the third one to the position of the Council.
The fourth and final column is left to the compromised text that is meant to emerge. However, although the first two positions are public, the other two have often textual elements that have not been adopted and the content of the fourth column remains inaccessible to public.
The treaties have provision for special legislative procedures to be used in sensitive areas. The number of options the national Parliaments have to express their opinions on legislative proposals prior to their final adoption by the Council of the EU has therefore been expanded. Other major assets of the Treaty of Lisbon for national Parliaments include an explicit assignment of the role in the supervision over compliance with the principle of subsidiarity Protocol on the Application of the Principle of Subsidiarity and Proportionality , incorporation of the principle of accountability of national Governments towards their respective Parliaments or citizens into the Treaties Article 10 Paragraph 2 of the Treaty on EU , involvement in the Convention method of Treaty revision Article 48 Paragraph 3 of the Treaty on EU and conferment of the veto right in certain cases of simplified treaty revision Article 48 Paragraph 7 of the Treaty on EU and Article 83 Paragraph 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
New powers of national Parliaments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon have been implemented and further elaborated by the amendments of rules of procedure of both chambers of the Czech Parliament Act No. Implementation of the Protocol and mechanisms defining co-operation between the government and parliament vary from Member State to Member State.
In the Czech Republic, co-operation is defined by the Constitution of the Czech Republic and the Rules of Procedure of both parliamentary chambers. In case the Senate or the Chamber of Deputies decides to scrutinise a draft legislative act, the Government is, according to the Directive, obliged to maintain a so-called parliamentary scrutiny reservation at proceedings in the EU institutions.
This reservation, until lifted, precludes a member of the Government from participating in final voting on the scrutinised proposal.
The existence of a bicameral Parliament raises a question of coordination between both chambers and their bodies in the EU legislative scrutiny, in order to present their stances both within the Czech Republic, i. The Constitution of the Czech Republic allows in its Article 10b Paragraph 3 for establishing a joint body for the purpose of executing parliamentary scrutiny in EU matters. Therefore, both chambers of the Parliament of the Czech Republic exercise the scrutiny separately and independently of each other.
The interest not to discuss the same European proposals in both chambers of the Parliament of the Czech Republic leads the Senate toward incrementally defining its specific role in EU scrutiny as the upper chamber of the Czech Parliament. The Senate is a permanent chamber composed of representatives elected for six years, its committees are less numerous and the position towards the Government is weaker. It does not contain any modification to the substance of the act. Codification helps to clarify EU legislation that has undergone frequent modifications.
If there is no modification of substance, the simplified procedure for adoption of a report under Rule 46 applies. Parliament shall take a decision by means of a single vote, without amendment or debate. The Commission may introduce implementing provisions for existing legislation. These provisions are presented to committees of experts from the Member States and forwarded to Parliament either for information or scrutiny. On a proposal from its committee responsible, Parliament may adopt a resolution opposing the measure, stating that the draft implementing measure exceeds the powers laid down in the legal act concerned, is not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality, and asking the Commission to withdraw or amend the draft of measures or submit a proposal under the appropriate legislative procedure.
Where a legislative act delegates to the Commission the power to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of a legislative act, the committee responsible shall examine any draft delegated act where it is transmitted to Parliament for scrutiny and may submit to Parliament a motion for a resolution any appropriate proposal in accordance with the provisions of the legislative act. The Commission has the legislative initiative. However, under the Treaty of Maastricht enhanced by the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament has a right of legislative initiative that allows it to ask the Commission to submit a proposal.
Parliament adopts a resolution on the annual programming.
Where an institution is unable to comply with the timetable laid down it is required to notify the other institutions as to the reasons for the delay and to propose a new timetable. On the basis of a report by one of its committees, under Article TFEU, Parliament, acting by a majority of its Members, may request the Commission to submit any appropriate legislative proposal.
Parliament may, at the same time, set a deadline for the submission of such a proposal. The Parliament committee responsible must first ask the Conference of Presidents for authorisation. The Commission may agree or refuse to submit the proposal requested. A proposal for a Union act on the basis of the right of initiative granted to Parliament under Article of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may also be proposed by an individual Member of the European Parliament.
Such a proposal shall be submitted to the President of the Parliament who refers it to the committee responsible for consideration.
It may decide to submit it to the plenary see above. In the areas where the treaties give the European Parliament the right of initiative, its committees may draw up a report on a subject within its remit and present a motion for a resolution to Parliament. They must request authorisation from the Conference of Presidents before drawing up a report.