Lincolns Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America

Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America

---

Now fellow Democrats I ask you if you are going to be forced into a war against your Brithren of the Southern States for the Negro. Whiting wrote that the truth was now plain even to "those stupid thick-headed persons who persisted in thinking that the President was a conservative man and that the war was for the restoration of the Union under the Constitution". War Democrats who rejected the Copperhead position within their party, found themselves in a quandary. While throughout the war they had continued to espouse the racist positions of their party and their disdain of the concerns of slaves, they did see the Proclamation as a viable military tool against the South, and worried that opposing it might demoralize troops in the Union army.

The question would continue to trouble them and eventually lead to a split within their party as the war progressed. Lincoln further alienated many in the Union two days after issuing the preliminary copy of the Emancipation Proclamation by suspending habeas corpus. His opponents linked these two actions in their claims that he was becoming a despot.

In light of this and a lack of military success for the Union armies, many War Democrat voters who had previously supported Lincoln turned against him and joined the Copperheads in the off-year elections held in October and November. In the elections , the Democrats gained 28 seats in the House as well as the governorship of New York.

Abraham Lincoln and Emancipation

Lincoln's friend Orville Hickman Browning told the president that the Proclamation and the suspension of habeas corpus had been "disastrous" for his party by handing the Democrats so many weapons. Lincoln made no response. Copperhead William Javis of Connecticut pronounced the election the "beginning of the end of the utter downfall of Abolitionism in the United States ".

McPherson and Allan Nevins state that though the results looked very troubling, they could be seen favorably by Lincoln; his opponents did well only in their historic strongholds and "at the national level their gains in the House were the smallest of any minority party's in an off-year election in nearly a generation.

Michigan, California, and Iowa all went Republican Moreover, the Republicans picked up five seats in the Senate. The initial Confederate response was one of expected outrage. The Proclamation was seen as vindication for the rebellion, and proof that Lincoln would have abolished slavery even if the states had remained in the Union. Army general Ulysses S. Grant observed that the Proclamation, combined with the usage of black soldiers by the U. Army, profoundly angered the Confederacy, saying that "the emancipation of the Negro, is the heaviest blow yet given the Confederacy.

The South rave a great deal about it and profess to be very angry. The Confederacy stated that the black U. Less than a year after the law's passage, the Confederates massacred black U. However, some Confederates welcomed the Proclamation, as they believed it would strengthen pro-slavery sentiment in the Confederacy and, thus, lead to greater enlistment of white men into the Confederate army.

According to one Confederate man from Kentucky, "The Proclamation is worth three hundred thousand soldiers to our Government at least It shows exactly what this war was brought about for and the intention of its damnable authors.

One Union soldier from New York stated worryingly after the Proclamation's passage, "I know enough of the Southern spirit that I think they will fight for the institution of slavery even to extermination. As a result of the Proclamation, the price of slaves in the Confederacy increased in the months after its issuance, with one Confederate from South Carolina opining in that "now is the time for Uncle to buy some negro women and children.

As Lincoln had hoped, the Proclamation turned foreign popular opinion in favor of the Union by gaining the support of anti-slavery countries and countries that had already abolished slavery especially the developed countries in Europe such as Great Britain or France.

This shift ended the Confederacy's hopes of gaining official recognition. Since the Emancipation Proclamation made the eradication of slavery an explicit Union war goal, it linked support for the South to support for slavery. Public opinion in Britain would not tolerate direct support for slavery. British companies, however, continued to build and operate blockade runners for the South.

As Henry Adams noted, "The Emancipation Proclamation has done more for us than all our former victories and all our diplomacy. On August 6, , Garibaldi wrote to Lincoln: Mayor Abel Haywood, a representative for workers from Manchester , England, wrote to Lincoln saying, "We joyfully honor you for many decisive steps toward practically exemplifying your belief in the words of your great founders: Lincoln's Gettysburg Address in November made indirect reference to the Proclamation and the ending of slavery as a war goal with the phrase "new birth of freedom". The Proclamation solidified Lincoln's support among the rapidly growing abolitionist element of the Republican Party and ensured that they would not block his re-nomination in In December , Lincoln issued his Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction , which dealt with the ways the rebel states could reconcile with the Union.

Key provisions required that the states accept the Emancipation Proclamation and thus the freedom of their slaves, and accept the Confiscation Acts , as well as the Act banning of slavery in United States territories. Near the end of the war, abolitionists were concerned that the Emancipation Proclamation would be construed solely as a war measure, Lincoln's original intent, and would no longer apply once fighting ended.

They were also increasingly anxious to secure the freedom of all slaves, not just those freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. Thus pressed, Lincoln staked a large part of his presidential campaign on a constitutional amendment to abolish slavery uniformly throughout the United States. Lincoln's campaign was bolstered by separate votes in both Maryland and Missouri to abolish slavery in those states.

Maryland's new constitution abolishing slavery took effect in November Slavery in Missouri was ended by executive proclamation of its governor, Thomas C. Fletcher, on January 11, Winning re-election, Lincoln pressed the lame duck 38th Congress to pass the proposed amendment immediately rather than wait for the incoming 39th Congress to convene. In January , Congress sent to the state legislatures for ratification what became the Thirteenth Amendment , banning slavery in all U. The amendment was ratified by the legislatures of enough states by December 6, , and proclaimed 12 days later.

There were about 40, slaves in Kentucky and 1, in Delaware who were liberated then.

As the years went on and American life continued to be deeply unfair towards blacks, cynicism towards Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation increased. Perhaps the strongest attack was Lerone Bennett's Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln's White Dream , which claimed that Lincoln was a white supremacist who issued the Emancipation Proclamation in lieu of the real racial reforms for which radical abolitionists pushed.

Guelzo noted the professional historians' lack of substantial respect for the document, since it has been the subject of few major scholarly studies. He argued that Lincoln was the US's "last Enlightenment politician " [] and as such was dedicated to removing slavery strictly within the bounds of law. Other historians have given more credit to Lincoln for what he accomplished within the tensions of his cabinet and a society at war, for his own growth in political and moral stature, and for the promise he held out to the slaves.

As Eric Foner wrote:. Lincoln was not an abolitionist or Radical Republican, a point Bennett reiterates innumerable times. He did not favor immediate abolition before the war, and held racist views typical of his time. But he was also a man of deep convictions when it came to slavery, and during the Civil War displayed a remarkable capacity for moral and political growth.

Navigation menu

Perhaps in rejecting the critical dualism—Lincoln as individual emancipator pitted against collective self-emancipators—there is an opportunity to recognise the greater persuasiveness of the combination. In a sense, yes: To venerate a singular —Great Emancipator' may be as reductive as dismissing the significance of Lincoln's actions. Who he was as a man, no one of us can ever really know. So it is that the version of Lincoln we keep is also the version we make. Martin Luther King Jr. These include a speech made at an observance of the hundredth anniversary of the issuing of the Proclamation made in New York City on September 12, where he placed it alongside the Declaration of Independence as an "imperishable" contribution to civilization, and "All tyrants, past, present and future, are powerless to bury the truths in these declarations".

He lamented that despite a history where the United States "proudly professed the basic principles inherent in both documents", it "sadly practiced the antithesis of these principles". He concluded "There is but one way to commemorate the Emancipation Proclamation. That is to make its declarations of freedom real; to reach back to the origins of our nation when our message of equality electrified an unfree world, and reaffirm democracy by deeds as bold and daring as the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation.

King's most famous invocation of the Emancipation Proclamation was in a speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom often referred to as the " I Have a Dream " speech. King began the speech saying "Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice.

It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity. But one hundred years later, we must face the tragic fact that the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. In the early s, Dr. Kennedy to bypass a Southern segregationist opposition in the Congress by issuing an executive order to put an end to segregation.

This envisioned document was referred to as the "Second Emancipation Proclamation". On June 11, , President Kennedy appeared on national television to address the issue of civil rights. Kennedy, who had been routinely criticized as timid by some of the leaders of the civil rights movement, told Americans that two black students had been peacefully enrolled in the University of Alabama with the aid of the National Guard despite the opposition of Governor George Wallace.

John Kennedy called it a "moral issue" [] Invoking the centennial of the Emancipation Proclamation he said. In the same speech, Kennedy announced he would introduce comprehensive civil rights legislation to the United States Congress which he did a week later he continued to push for its passage until his assassination in November Joseph holds Lyndon Johnson's ability to get that bill, the Civil Rights Act of , passed on July 2, was aided by "the moral forcefulness of the June 11 speech" which turned "the narrative of civil rights from a regional issue into a national story promoting racial equality and democratic renewal".

During the civil rights movement of the s, Lyndon B. Johnson invoked the Emancipation Proclamation holding it up as a promise yet to be fully implemented. As Vice President while speaking from Gettysburg on May 30, Memorial Day , at the centennial of the Emancipation Proclamation, Johnson connected it directly with the ongoing civil rights struggles of the time saying "One hundred years ago, the slave was freed.

One hundred years later, the Negro remains in bondage to the color of his skin In this hour, it is not our respective races which are at stake—it is our nation. Let those who care for their country come forward, North and South, white and Negro, to lead the way through this moment of challenge and decision Until justice is blind to color, until education is unaware of race, until opportunity is unconcerned with color of men's skins, emancipation will be a proclamation but not a fact.

To the extent that the proclamation of emancipation is not fulfilled in fact, to that extent we shall have fallen short of assuring freedom to the free. As president, Johnson again invoked the proclamation in a speech presenting the Voting Rights Act at a joint session of Congress on Monday, March 15, This was one week after violence had been inflicted on peaceful civil rights marchers during the Selma to Montgomery marches.

And we shall overcome. As a man whose roots go deeply into Southern soil, I know how agonizing racial feelings are.

I know how difficult it is to reshape the attitudes and the structure of our society. But a century has passed—more than years—since the Negro was freed. And he is not fully free tonight. It was more than years ago that Abraham Lincoln—a great President of another party—signed the Emancipation Proclamation. But emancipation is a proclamation and not a fact. A century has passed—more than years—since equality was promised, and yet the Negro is not equal. A century has passed since the day of promise, and the promise is unkept. The time of justice has now come, and I tell you that I believe sincerely that no force can hold it back.

Please visit our Lehrman Institute Sites

It is right in the eyes of man and God that it should come, and when it does, I think that day will brighten the lives of every American. He finally becomes frustrated and explains it is a proclamation for certain people who wanted emancipation. Bigger, Longer and Uncut , Chef asks the military commander if he has "ever heard of the Emancipation Proclamation?

The Emancipation Proclamation is celebrated around the world including on stamps of nations such as the Republic of Togo. Designed by Georg Olden , an initial printing of million stamps was authorized. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about American history. For emancipation proclamations in other countries, see Abolition of slavery timeline. Henry Lewis Stephens , untitled watercolor c. The five page original document, held in the National Archives Building.

Until it had been bound with other proclamations in a large volume held by the Department of State.

Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, by Allen C. Guelzo

By country or region. Slave states and free states. Slave and free states. Abraham Lincoln and slavery. Executive orders are simply presidential directives issued to agents of the executive department by its boss. The Executive Branch of Federal Government: People, Process, and Politics. National Archives and Records Administration. National Endowment for the Humanities. Masur tells the story of the day interval in Lincoln's Hundred Days: War Becomes Revolution, — pp. Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom: U of Nebraska Press.

See a Problem?

The Library of Congress. The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. The Fifth Amendment's Just Compensation clause provided the proslavery camp with a bastion for fortifying the peculiar institution against congressional restrictions to its spread westward. Based on this property-rights centered argument, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, in Dred Scott v. Sanford , found the Missouri Compromise unconstitutionally violated due process.

Guelzo departs from the conventional account in two important ways, both outgrowths of his emphasis on Lincoln's prudence. First, Guelzo interprets Lincoln's offer of gradual, compensated emancipation and the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation as prudent, irreversible strides toward his true goal of complete, nationwide emancipation: Once again, Lincoln's writings and speeches at the time strongly suggest that Guelzo has put the cart of emancipation before the horse of Lincoln's intentions.

Most historians view Lincoln's actions before January 1, —when he signed the Emancipation Proclamation—as attempts not to hustle the nation along the road toward the elimination of bondage but rather to maintain the Union by cementing the loyalty of border slave states, by appealing to what he considered the silent majority of white Unionists within the states in rebellion, and by reassuring northern Democrats that he was making war against the rebellion rather than against slavery or the constitution.

At least in my reading, Guelzo seems to view the emancipationist prudence of Lincoln's pre actions toward slavery through the lens of post, post-emancipation hindsight. The evidence is overwhelming that Lincoln hoped his pre actions towards slavery would succeed in ending the rebellion and saving the Union. If his plans had succeeded and his hopes had been realized, slavery would have been saved along with the Union, at least for the duration of Lincoln's presidency and probably long afterward.

Guelzo's insistence on Lincoln's pre emancipationist prudence strikes me as unsustainably teleological. It charts a straight line backward from the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment in December to Lincoln's nomination for the presidency in May To claim that Lincoln toed that line before in order to arrive at its end point in seems to credit Lincoln with prescience unsupported by his words and deeds at that time.

Guelzo's second departure from conventional accounts is to align Lincoln's prudence with providence. Acknowledging Lincoln's "vague religious profile," Guelzo declares that, "Lincoln nevertheless understood that a significant part of the politics of prudence involved deference to providence" 6. The Emancipation Proclamation "was one of the biggest political gambles in American history," Guelzo argues, but "Lincoln's gamble may be considered a prudent one for the role that providence came to play in it" 6.

During the war, Lincoln's view of providence veered "toward the providence of a mysterious and self-concealing God," and "Lincoln came to see the Proclamation as the only alternative God had left to emancipation being swept off the table entirely" 7. Guelzo erects his interpretative edifice of the divine inspiration of Lincoln's Proclamation on a fragile evidentiary foundation. Guelzo focuses on the cabinet meeting of September 22, , when Lincoln announced his decision to issue the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. The best contemporary account of Lincoln's statement to the cabinet is the diary entry written that evening by Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles.

Lincoln, Welles reported, "remarked that he had made a vow, a covenant, that if God gave us the victory in the approaching battle, he would consider it an indication of Divine will, and that it was his duty to move forward in the cause of emancipation. It might be thought strange, he said, that he had in this way submitted the disposal of matters when the way was not clear to his mind what he should do.

God had decided this question in favor of the slaves. He was satisfied it was right, was confirmed and strengthened in his action by the vow and the results" Diary of Gideon Welles [], 1: Secretary of the Treasury Samuel Chase noted a similar but less detailed remark in his diary.

Guelzo also cites artist Francis B. Carpenter's recollection of what Chase told him Lincoln had said, as reported by Isaac Arnold, who did not attend the cabinet meeting The History of Abraham Lincoln [], — This thirdhand account bears little weight, especially since Arnold cites it in a footnote to underscore his claim that Lincoln's decision to issue the Preliminary Proclamation was lifted on the wings of prayers by millions of antislavery people and by Lincoln himself "seeking prayerfully the guidance of Almighty God" Arnold, — The word prayer never appears in Welles's diary entry, suggesting that Arnold bathed Lincoln's cabinet meeting in a divine glow not evident to those present.

While there is no reason to doubt that Lincoln said more or less what Welles and Chase jotted in their diaries, there is reason to wonder whether those words meant, as Guelzo declares, that Lincoln committed "the nation, to outright emancipation on the strength of a sign he had asked from God, as though it were the Emperor Constantine or Oliver Cromwell rather than Abraham Lincoln sitting at the head of the cabinet table" Guelzo provides an authoritative account of the July 22, , cabinet meeting when Lincoln first announced his plan to issue an emancipation proclamation, but, on Secretary of State William Seward's advice, decided to wait for enough of a Union military victory to make it appear an act of statesmanship rather than desperation.

According to Guelzo and other Lincoln scholars, Lincoln told his cabinet in July that he had already "resolved" to adopt an "emancipation policy" and that he did not seek the cabinet's opinions about whether he should do it, since that "was settled in his own mind" Guelzo says nothing about Lincoln getting or seeking a sign from God in July, and there is no evidence that he did. Unless one were to argue that Lincoln changed his mind about emancipation after July 22 and then was swayed by a sign from God to return to his previous resolution—and there is no evidence that he did change his mind about emancipation between July 22 and September 22, nor does Guelzo argue that he did—then Lincoln's statement about divine will in the September meeting appears far less decisive than Guelzo asserts.

It appears less a profession of divine inspiration or authorization for the Emancipation Proclamation than an invocation of divine favor for a decision Lincoln had already taken, except for determining its timing and final form. His efforts were unavailing.

Even after on September 22 President Lincoln issued the draft emancipation following the Union victory at Antietam, Republicans and blacks worried that he might back off from issuing it in final form — especially after the Republican Party suffered serious losses in the November elections. Historian Edna Greene Medford wrote: When the South failed to accede to his terms and Lincoln honored the promise of the preliminary document, African-Americans throughout the North reacted to the news with unbridled joy.

Black organizations held parades and assembled in mammoth gatherings to listen to prominent abolitionists extol the virtues of the president. At one such rally in New York, the Rev. But the President had his eyes clearly set upon emancipation, which was based upon military necessity. The Proclamation was an emergency measure, a substitute for the permanent plan that would really rid the country of slavery, but a substitute as sincere and profound as the timbers that shore up an endangered mine shaft and prevent it from collapsing entirely. Historian Gerald Sorin wrote: Their bow to anti-black sentiment was in large measure defensive.

They felt that in order to have the power to abolish slavery, they must be politically successful. And this meant dissociating the party from the idea of equality. President Lincoln proclaimed emancipation as a military necessity for the war to preserve the union. He thus applied it to the areas under rebellion — not the areas then under the control of the federal government. Although his action has been criticized as an empty gesture, it was far from that. It encouraged thousands of slaves to self-liberate.

No one in their right mind could seriously recommend canceling the Proclamation after ordering black soldiers into the nightmare of war. Saving the Union had become more than an end in itself.

• Archeologia del presente (Einaudi tascabili. Scrittori Vol. 1174) (Italian Edition)
• Light Side
• The Way of Truth Eternal (Book 1)
• Ansätze der Erfolgsmessung integrierter Kommunikation (German Edition)
• Texthaftigkeit von Hypertext (German Edition)