Contents:
Why is Michael Petrilli or Forbes or Rick Hess or any of the other popular list-makers interested in a ranking or rating system for those in education? And yet we do. To whom do they matter? Whose interests do these definitions and standards and measurements and algorithms serve? What sorts of often unexamined legacies do these practices carry forward?
The alleged faculty of divining, from physical contact or proximity only, the qualities or properties of an object, or of persons or things that have been in contact with it. The first reported use of this word was — J. The measurement of the duration and intensity of mental states or processes. Psychometrics is best understood as the development of tools for vertical classification and the production of social value. Psychometry claims to measure the mind.
Klout claims to measure online influence. But look at the OED.
Look at those definitions: I stand by what I wrote then which always feels like a bit of a triumph for a blogger. The first reported use of this word was — J.
The measurement of the duration and intensity of mental states or processes. Psychometrics is best understood as the development of tools for vertical classification and the production of social value.
Psychometry claims to measure the mind. Klout claims to measure online influence.
For influence , it works primarily by assessing retweets, replies, mentions and follows on Twitter. Your challenge is to figure out which feature is most useful for you. Not a fan of Klout at all, you can just tell all the social media managers are obsessed with it, as if their careers are on the line. So the point of all this; your opinion may be worth more than you realise and is only becoming more valuable. And if someone is going to adopt it as their metric in education, they should probably grok that. Again, he doesn't seem to understand that Klout signs you up without your permission.
But look at the OED. Look at those definitions: I stand by what I wrote then which always feels like a bit of a triumph for a blogger. And if someone is going to adopt it as their metric in education, they should probably grok that.
And do folks respond? Does Klout include any sentiment analysis? Oh my does he. Petrilli says that folks should sign up for Klout. Again, he doesn't seem to understand that Klout signs you up without your permission. John Scalzi described the principle behind Klout's operation as "socially evil" in its exploitation of its users' status anxiety.
Ben Rothke concluded that "Klout has its work cut out and it seems like they need to be in beta a while longer. Klout can and should be applauded for trying to measure this monstrosity called social influence; but their results of influence should in truth, carry very little influence. Klout was criticised for the opacity of their methodology.
In spite of the controversy, some employers made hiring decisions based on Klout scores. As reported in an article for Wired , a man recruited for a VP position with fifteen years of experience consulting for companies including America Online , Ford and Kraft was eliminated as a candidate specifically because of his Klout score, which at the time was 34, in favour of a candidate with a score of From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Klout Type of business Subsidiary Type of site. San Francisco , California.
This article's Criticism or Controversy section may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. Please integrate the section's contents into the article as a whole, or rewrite the material. Retrieved 22 October Retrieved April 24, Retrieved 28 March