Contents:
These chapters cover a range of issues from recent public health concerns such as pandemic flu to work in the life sciences such as DNA banking and cloning. Here, Annas provocatively contests other established approaches to these issues. One strength of Worst Case Bioethics is its broad inclusion of contemporary topics, which not only provides relevant examples for different readers, but also underscores the need to consider seriously the implications of using worst-case scenarios in multiple domains.
However, those interested in or working on particular issues are likely to be left wanting more — such as additional facts or perspectives, a serious review of alternate approaches and counterarguments, and a more complete explication of the arguments that lead to the conclusions that are announced. Regardless, as Annas himself concludes Worst Case Bioethics , three basic rationales are frequently used in society to justify particular actions: What they have in common is that they all embody an implicit worst case scenario: In my mind, that would be a fine way to start thinking about best-case bioethics.
National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List J Clin Invest v.
Published online Aug 2. Reviewed by Jeremy Sugarman. Worst Case Bioethics takes on some of the most contentious issues that fall within the ambit of bioethics, broadly considered.
Your Web browser is not enabled for JavaScript. Saz Jibson Ryan marked it as to-read Jan 02, WorldCat is the world's largest library catalog, helping you find library materials online. Authors Affiliations are at time of print publication. Find it on Scholar.
The book comprises three parts. An underlying theme in this section is the relationship of state and federal laws regarding these issues, which helps to illuminate some of the political activity surrounding them. These chapters cover a range of issues from recent public health concerns such as pandemic flu to work in the life sciences such as DNA banking and cloning.
Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster, and Public Health [George J. Annas] on www.farmersmarketmusic.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Carefully reasoned, clearly. Worst-case scenarios are commonplace in discussions and deliberations concerning science, new technologies, public health, and health care.
Here, Annas provocatively contests other established approaches to these issues. One strength of Worst Case Bioethics is its broad inclusion of contemporary topics, which not only provides relevant examples for different readers, but also underscores the need to consider seriously the implications of using worst-case scenarios in multiple domains.
However, those interested in or working on particular issues are likely to be left wanting more — such as additional facts or perspectives, a serious review of alternate approaches and counterarguments, and a more complete explication of the arguments that lead to the conclusions that are announced.
Regardless, as Annas himself concludes Worst Case Bioethics , three basic rationales are frequently used in society to justify particular actions: What they have in common is that they all embody an implicit worst case scenario: In my mind, that would be a fine way to start thinking about best-case bioethics.
Go to JCI Insight.