Contents:
You wonder if the writer himself even gave it a second look after an initial draft. Or did he just rest on his laurels and wait for the sycophants at the New York Times and the National Book Awards to coronate him? View all 5 comments. Aug 20, Nathan Rostron rated it really liked it. Hemon is not a rock star writer and garnered only polite applause. Unlike Diaz in Oscar Wao, at any rate , Hemon's writing is not flashy or stylistically strutting somewhat awkwardly to allow for humongous cojones. Born in Sarajevo, Hemon writes with a syncopated English-language sensibility; it seems quiet but then it will sneak up on you and knock you flat.
Doctor Peter Anderson has invented a computer generated Heaven called the Heaven Project where the souls of the departed can spend their eternal existence. Editorial Reviews. About the Author. David James Zoppi is an author and writer of stories, Promised Land - The Heaven Project - Kindle edition by David Zoppi. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets.
This one's definitely worth reading--my only complaint is that after the stunning first 40 pages the story plateaued and remained consistently interesting and well written and good, rather than continuing to ramp up into the stratosphere. Nov 01, Josh added it Shelves: I got halfway, but this one is being put away for good. Mar 20, Maya Lang rated it liked it. Aleksandar Hemon is a brilliant, heady writer: This "novel" it is not a novel is disappointing precisely because its author is so talented.
The disappointment is worse somehow against the specter of what might have been.
A bowl of cereal i Aleksandar Hemon is a brilliant, heady writer: A bowl of cereal is preferable to a gourmet meal that falls flat. Its opening sections are its strongest.
The true story of Lazarus Averbuch is compelling; the thinly veiled story of an author's quest to document Averbunch's tale is also equally compelling. From there, things grow mired. The story suffers from a failure to launch. It is a car trying to get out of the mud. Those initial sections are the first jolt of the accelerator, hopeful and promising, before the disappointing slide back into the muck.
The sections become redundant and strangely formulaic: There are no surprises. Worse, the writing often feels detached. To go back to my restaurant metaphor, the result is a tasting menu where the ingredients don't change: His memoir, "The Book of My Lives," is more powerful. The references to his own life, what he is trying to convey here, are more potently delivered in essay form. Perhaps that's it, then.
Hemon is a writer—this is obvious—but perhaps not a novelist. Sometimes the turn to fiction gives an author freedom, but here it causes him to be evasive. Essays are where Hemon shines because there is no place to hide. Mar 13, Cameron rated it did not like it.
I often think that many critics give the book or movie, in many more familiar cases a good review because it is something they are supposed to do. You don't want to be known as the critic who turned his nose up at the Latvian drama about a gay, existentialist teen trying to survive the drab, grim reality of life in a post-communist regime, would you? What about the Paraguayan masterpiece about the girl that left that life of street gangs to become a school teacher that was later murdered by st I often think that many critics give the book or movie, in many more familiar cases a good review because it is something they are supposed to do.
What about the Paraguayan masterpiece about the girl that left that life of street gangs to become a school teacher that was later murdered by street gangs. Well, you better give it a review, praising it for its "honesty" and "integrity". If all else fails, try to pigeon-hole it into a category that will make it seem like you totally got it on a different level than everyone else. In my experience, The Lazarus Project is just such a book. It had to be good.
So many people were saying such good things. It was nominated for a National Book Award, and they don't just hand those things out to any old James Patterson. With excitement, I started reading, and reading, and reading and before I knew it, I was in the Chariots of Fire of novels and I wanted to get out as soon as possible. The idea for a decent book is there—a Bosnian man discovers his own identity while researching the historical account of an immigrant murdered by a police sergeant in Chicago.
Yet, so many elements are missing that there is little left to bring it all cohesively together. It weaves in and out of the two stories; the first being an over-fictionalized and over-dramatized retelling of the after-effects of the immigrant's murder and the second being the on-the-road story of the writer aimlessly winding his way through Eastern Europe. Story A is poorly told to the point of being very uninteresting.
Story B is told in a stream-of-consciousness style that comes off as smug and utterly confusing when it comes to advancing the plot. There is so much about this book that is not true from the reviews. It isn't a "tour-de-force" as I read in one review. It also isn't, as I read in another, "a page-turner" unless you are turning the pages without reading them just to see how many more pages you have left to get through.
It is not a comedy as one review ridiculously put it.
Sure, some characters tell jokes to each other. But they are jokes that are constructed in an Eastern-European mindset, and something that makes no sense to someone who hasn't had to stand in a breadline. There is no comedy in this, however "wryly-drawn" as one review said. It could have used a better editor. It could have used a better plot. It also could have used some more honest reviews. Which you should trust. Because I totally hated that one Latvian movie. Why does everyone love this book so much? Why are we so excited about this guy?
Because he is Bosnian, and we don't know any Bosnian writers? Or because his protagonist is a miserable, wandering writer of the old breed, Why does everyone love this book so much? Or because his protagonist is a miserable, wandering writer of the old breed, whose cigarette-smoking, whore-befriending, devil-may-care companion is his role model and raison d'etre? Or is it because he writes about poor Jewish anarchist immigrant refugees, and we can all get behind that? Well I'll tell you what. I was bored to tears. What does our aforesaid protagonist writer-man want to share with us so badly that he has to take us to a slew of post-Soviet sad scenes casinos, brothels, cafe after cafe and drone on for so long about his childhood he wasn't even in Sarajevo during the war!
Writer-man and macho-friend drink strong coffee! And look at blond girls! And sit in depressing hotel rooms! And drink more coffee! And by the by, what does any of this dreary misguided misogynist rambling have to do with Lazarus, the dead immigrant Jew whose story which constitutes the interesting half of the book writer-man is in Eastern Europe to research in the first place?
Yes, it is impressive that Hemon writes in his second language, and yes, his writing is itself a lovely thing. But master story-teller he is not, and comparisons to Nabokov strike me as absurd. This book is not a story, but a jumble of scenes of Hemon's past, some beautifully painted, others dull, none of which fit together to become the journey we are prepared to experience.
What does writer-man find? What is he looking for? I will never know, because I started having the kind of panic attacks interspersed with restlessness that I had while trying to read Milan Kundera's "Unbearable Lightness of Being.
Let me just say I do realize this is the pot calling the kettle black. So I say skip it, until Hemon realizes he should just buy a journal and write his memoir. Because unlike the talking heads of the literary elite, I was reading to bring forth the ghost of Lazarus. Hear his story, come to terms with his devils, imagine his world. Aleksandar Hemon has been on my radar screen since The Question of Bruno, which I read a while ago and remembered quite fondly, but what with one thing and another, I let his works slide by me, and then, several months ago, I noticed The Lazarus Project remaindered in paperback, and I thought, oh, right, that's The Question of Bruno guy, and I bought it, and it sat on a pile of books by the front door, waiting for me to grab on my way to the subway.
Oh, and yes, I've kept up with Hemon's appeara Aleksandar Hemon has been on my radar screen since The Question of Bruno, which I read a while ago and remembered quite fondly, but what with one thing and another, I let his works slide by me, and then, several months ago, I noticed The Lazarus Project remaindered in paperback, and I thought, oh, right, that's The Question of Bruno guy, and I bought it, and it sat on a pile of books by the front door, waiting for me to grab on my way to the subway.
So then I hadn't been taking the subway for a while because my girlfriend has been helping me get to work, which is great, and I love her, and so forth, but a few days ago, circumstances prevented her giving me a ride, and so I grabbed The Lazarus Project and headed out the door. And then I damn near missed my stop. This is a book that you start and you think, wow, this guy is really good, and then you keep reading because you can't stop , and then you think, holy crap, this guy is REALLY really good, and the pages burn through your hands because you cannot stop, and--now, here, we come specifically to this novel--you realize that this book is not merely good.
It's great, and when I say great, I don't mean, you know, as great as the last great Stephen King novel great, or as great as the last page-turner you finished great. The Lazarus Project is a great novel on the order of. Amazing , or the scope of the novel. I absolutely cannot wait to read this again. Jul 06, Knitography rated it liked it Shelves: The Lazarus Project consists two intertwined threads; in Lazarus Averbuch, a Russian immigrant and pogrom survivor is shot by the Chicago chief of police. The story is told from the perspective of his sister Olga as she tries to make sense of her loss.
In the present, Vladamir Brik, a writer and Bosnian immigrant, is researching Lazarus' story, hoping to turn it into a book. Those parts of the book set in were well-written and enjoyable to read. The author really succeeded at getting in The Lazarus Project consists two intertwined threads; in Lazarus Averbuch, a Russian immigrant and pogrom survivor is shot by the Chicago chief of police. The author really succeeded at getting into Olga's head; as a reader I cared about her and was interested in how her story would play out. The transitions from past to present and back again were smooth, but unfortunately the parts of the book set in the present were a real disappointment.
The Vladamir Brik chapters all followed the same formula - a lot of annoying self-flagellation from Brik with a few stories from his friend Rora mixed in. Brik simply isn't a likable character; I quickly got tired of his ceaseless whining and didn't really care what happened to him.
Rora is a more interesting character and perhaps he was meant to be, but as the story is told from Brik's perspective, not liking him really detracted from my reading enjoyment. It was also clear very early on what was going to happen with the Brik and Rora characters, so essentially you're just slogging through that storyline to get back to Olga, and eventually the end of the book. A combination of stubbornness and enjoyment of the Olga storyline kept me reading, but in the end this wasn't a satisfying read. I think the book could have been a lot better, and it almost had some interesting things to say about immigration, citizenship, and the concept of "home" - almost.
Jul 01, Matt rated it really liked it. I should say up front, Aleks Hemon is one of the two or three living writers that I like most, who I am most excited when I see that they have a new book. It's Hemon's entry in the "return to the old country" genre of novels, of which everyone has one in them. Hemon's version intercuts that p I should say up front, Aleks Hemon is one of the two or three living writers that I like most, who I am most excited when I see that they have a new book.
Hemon's version intercuts that present day story with the turn of the century murder of an immigrant Jew connected, loosely and inaccurately, with anarchists in Chicago. It's a tantalizing possibility, the crossover between the immigration-reverse immigration thing, but I'm not sure it totally works here. There are some stirring observations in Hemon's book, and some interesting stories told, through the narrator's traveling companion-- but somehow the incidents never really reach that level of crispness where we see better what they are leading toward.
And the story in the past seems equally beset by ambivalence about what, exactly, it wants, lurching from social critique to story of the murdered man's sister, and resolving even that story inconclusively It's just weird, because there's a lot to like here, but the book feels a little bit restrained, never quite reaching the manic pitch of Nowhere Man that made you believe it had to all hold together. This feels a little overworked, a little too edited, and the result is a mess of stuff that for me at least didn't quite connect.
Jan 31, rmn rated it really liked it Shelves: A surprisingly perceptive and intriguing novel juxtaposing the life and subsequent murder of a Jewish immigrant to the United States in the early s after he had escaped from a Ukranian pogrom, with the life of the protagonist and his friend who each immigrated to the US from Bosnia one before the Yugoslavian civil war and the other after. The protagonist is a Bosnian writer living in present day Chicago who wants to write a book about the murder of an accused anarchist in by the Chicago A surprisingly perceptive and intriguing novel juxtaposing the life and subsequent murder of a Jewish immigrant to the United States in the early s after he had escaped from a Ukranian pogrom, with the life of the protagonist and his friend who each immigrated to the US from Bosnia one before the Yugoslavian civil war and the other after.
The protagonist is a Bosnian writer living in present day Chicago who wants to write a book about the murder of an accused anarchist in by the Chicago Chief of Police. To get the full back story on the victim, he takes a long lost childhood friend of his on a journey through Eastern Europe where they ruminate on the war, the actions of individuals, the existence of cultural differences and what it is to be American, and the meaning of home. This is a really well written book from a structural standpoint and from a language standpoint.
Oct 24, David rated it it was amazing. I am not sure the average American reader can really understand this book. It captures so well the thoughts of someone who drifts in this world without a home, not because he does not have access to such a place, but because his past shapes him so much he can no longer accept the concept of home others offer him. The book is not perfect by any means. Some reviewers see it as an immigrant I am not sure the average American reader can really understand this book. Some reviewers see it as an immigrant story, but that is a very myopic and generally American view.
This story is about connections and the struggle to hold onto the un certainty when people come from drastically different places, both physically and psychologically. It is about loneliness. Rabih Alameddine's favorite Chekhov quote: Nothing ever goes away, everything stays inside it. It is a different reality. Aug 21, Ashaspencer rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: This book is by a Serbian writer who has been living in Chicago since The author lived in Uptown and Andersonville -the two neighborhoods in Chicago that I grew up in.
The book begins in these neighborhoods, and then follows the main character on a trip across Eastern Europe - prague, vienna, budapest, etc. I read the book on a train trip from Vienna to Budapest, as I was in the process of planning my upcoming trip to Prague.
It was a somewhat strange experience, as the book seeemd to be fo This book is by a Serbian writer who has been living in Chicago since It was a somewhat strange experience, as the book seeemd to be following me along my trip from Chicago to these new cities So the book really resonated with me, not just because of the unlikely similarities between the story and my own adventures, but also because he is a really beautiful writer. The novel discusses the intricacies of establishing one's place in a country or city where one doesn't feel completely at home, when one no longer has another place that can truly be considered home either.
View all 3 comments. Dec 15, Robin Friedman rated it really liked it. The first story is set in Chicago of and is based upon a historical event. The police department attempts to cover-up the circumstances of the murder by claiming Averbuch was an anarchist. The story explores the murder and its aftermath, centering on Averbuch's burial. The novel further describes how Averbuch was a victim of an infamous Pogrom and came to the United States where has dreams of freedom and a new life were dashed.
Averbuch's murder occurs at the outset of the novel. Thus the focus of the story is on his older sister Olga who is inconsolable upon her brother's death. As her story develops, it bears resemblances to Sophocles' play Antigone. Olga grieves because her brother has not been buried with the rites and rituals of Jewish law. As in Sopocles' play, Olga faces tension between the requirements of a religious burial and what she comes to realize she must do in order to live and find a modicum of peace.
She is pitted against not only the City of Chicago but also by the more established and settled elements of the Chicago Jewish community. The characters of Olga and Lazarus are poignantly developed. In addition, the story shows a great deal of Lazarus' and Olga's friend Isadore and of Olga's efforts to protect him from the Chicago police.
The portrayal in the book is of a Chicago which is rough and tumble and corrupt. Growing and welcoming of immigrants, the city also fears them. In particular, the city and many people fear the anarchist movement led by Emma Goldman. The story develops against the background of this paranoia.
The immigrant experience does not end well here for Lazarus and his sister. The second story involves a contemporary Bosnian immigrant, Vladimir Brik. Some contributors to the symposium will be invited to submit papers for publication. Achievements Posted by lamacs On June - 2 - Claiming the Promise Posted by lamacs On February - 28 - Lawrence Hill Ticket Price: The Promised Land Project PLP is a multidisciplinary research project that focuses on the study the role and evolution of the early black settlements in the Chatham-Kent area, whose role has been uncelebrated and contributions neglected.
The overall objectives of this project are: Past Symposiums Posted by lamacs On June - 15 - Second General Symposium St. The Promised Land Project. Place and Space in African Canadian Communities The Promised Land Community-University Research Alliance invites community researchers, educators, museum workers, students, artists and academics to submit proposals for presentations at its fourth annual Public Symposium, Revisiting the Promise: The symposium will be built around two central themes: December Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Archived from the original on Films directed by Andrzej Wajda. Man of Hope Afterimage. Retrieved from " https: Webarchive template wayback links Articles needing additional references from December All articles needing additional references Articles containing Polish-language text.
Views Read Edit View history. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. This page was last edited on 7 May , at By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.