Contents:
Similarly, oral glucose can be administered buccally. I don't think many people actually do so however AVers claiming intramuscular vaccines are injected directly into the bloodstream. I'm sure you're correct, but I have trouble wrapping my mind around such ignorance as I'm sure I knew better than tha,t by the time I'd finished 6th grade science class.
Maybe not exactly like DiNallo, but sorta like DiNallo. There's some evidence that various forms of 'woo' make the rigors of chemo easier to bear physcologically for some people. There's no need for a medical intervention to require patents to give up their faiths entirely as long as the two ca co-exist in practice if not philosophy.
We wouldn't ask cancer patients to give up prayer, only seek that faith-healing not be substituted for standard of care. Dietz says an increasing number of her patients are choosing to complement their conventional treatment with integrative care, a combination that in her opinion, has the best results. This attribution may be sloppy reporting, or Dietz may actually believe 'integrative care' has some direct physiological effect on cancer.
Both reporters and physicians making public statements ought to realize that simply claiming 'best results' is inadequate and misleading. Lest the public draw false conclusions about the utility of woo, such claims must include 'what results? One example of 'IM' success, for example, is the use of 'Native Medicine' to complement conventional treatment, especially for addiction and depression, in First Nations health clinics in Canada. They have sweat lodges and drumming classes, which help promote self-esteem, build rationales for self-care, etc. Of course, they don't advertise these methods as purely psychological, but they're clear they won't work miracles by themselves.
And there's no doubt these programs do indeed get people through the door who wouldn 't do 'conventional alone' and have better results than 'conventional alone' in terms of lower rates of suicide and arrest. Sadly in many of these cases, the media won't cover the death, after all, 'refuses conventional treatment, dies of cancer' is not as compelling a narrative as 'refuses conventional treatment, survives cancer'.
The treatment was not easy. DiNallo says her body responded negatively to the detox for many months. But the most scary was hair loss. When that happened, I was really scared. Now I'm really wondering where the supplements were manufactured and what exactly she was ingesting. She says that she "eliminated sugar" from her diet, then guzzles juice like it's going out of style. On the basis of what is known of solid tumor biochemistry, it might make sense try to drastically decrease your consumption of carbohydrates, but you certainly won't achieve that with the idiocy that is "juicing", and you are very unlikely to successfully maintain it with a goddamn vegan diet - unless you are excessively fond of avocado and nuts.
In any case, refusing surgery for invasive breast cancer is downright stupid. A case can be made for refusing the adjuvant based on your low risk of recurrence vs side effects, but you have to be very misinformed to refuse surgery. Such as with this article. I have taken on hypothyroidism, cervical cancer, kidney stones, gall stones, lymphadema due to a surgery , tons of gut issues including my intestines tying themselves in knots with scar tissue, eye stigmatism, and tons of hormonal issues. For over 20 years Traditional medicine did NOT help me with any of these except for the surgery to untangle my intestines.
Something synthetics and traditional medicine couldn't do in 15 yrs. I could go on and on, however what I really want to share is that during my time working in and personally experiencing the alternative medicine field; I have seen some miraculous things.
Stage 4 breast cancer showing clear cancer panels within 12 weeks of treatment as a best case senecio. Others do take longer, as with everything else each person is different. Children with autism who speak again, make eye contact and hug the nurses within less than 6 months of treatment.
Based solely on my personal experience and what I have seen first hand, I would challenge anyone who calls Ty's information quackery or false. I would challenge these people to sit down and talk to the real live people who have gone the traditional route. I would also challenge them NOT to skew the data by only reporting those who may not have made it, as the full story must be told in order to gain the true insight. Patients who have been told there is nothing else that can be done often seek out Ty. Sometimes it truly is just too late, yet some who have been told this and find Ty's work do get better and go on to live years.
Do your own research people and make your own decisions. Do not let others bully you with skewed information. That's a nice little rant. Do you have some actual evidence, or even actual named people who beat stage IV breast cancer with just alternative medicine. BTW, as I said above "cancer panels" usually means blood work, and you can't be shown to be free of disease with just blood work alone. It takes scans that find no detectable disease. That's why I'm veery suspicious of anyone promoting cancer cures without mentioning success- and therefore failure-rates Which side, Cindy, mainstream or alternative medicine, do you think is usually the one omitting such crucial information?
If this were my willful and independent daughter, my questions would be: I've seen CAM patients getting more elemental and complete blood work from their naturopaths than their MDs. Part of what this guy's formulation seems to elaborate from is a CAM maneuver for dissolving fibrocystic lumps in under an hour. What I've personally witnessed more than once is the mature "regular" drs' utter shock when things dissolve or necrose in ways, times, or places they haven't seen before.
The story is certainly thin on supporting evidence, but it's very thick with allegations and pro-woo propaganda, which could have disastrous consequences for some if they allow themselves to be influenced by it. And why are you addressing your questions to the people here who, as you acknowledge yourself, won't be in a position to answer them?
Let us know what luck you've had trying to get some meaningful responses from those claiming this miracle. Perhaps you can fill in with some verifiable data on the miracles which caused these drs. So how well do your methods work for type 1 diabetes or obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Basically prove that your methods are better with actual evidence in the form of PubMed indexed papers by reputable qualified researchers.
Folks, if I had the means to perform all the studies all of you are asking for, I would gladly conduct and present them for all of you who place so much emphasis on requiring them. As well, if it were not a HIPPA and privacy violation to provide the names of all the people I have seen with my own eyes who have been helped; I would provide them in a heartbeat with their permission.
It is brand new without tags! I actually do hope that Ms. You should be the most studied person in the world. Well, maybe not the organic sulfur. No-one can tell for sure if you will develop long-term lymphedema.
Shouldn't the only proof that matters be that the people do get better? These drugs and procedures come on the market then it isn't long before we all learn of how damaging they really are. Did all those studies where those side effects were hidden really matter? All of you are by right free to make your own choices for yourself. If you need proof that something works, talk to the people who have said it worked form them before you make your final judgement. What, exactly, have you seen dissolve, under what conditions and causes, over what time period, and what did it dissolve into? Nevertheless, DiNallo carried on and eventually, the side effects went away.
Your patient has a symptom you've never seen before. You might be poisoning your patient. You might have caused endocrine damage. You might have caused a metabolic disorder. In fact you certainly did at least one of those things. That's for those science wimps. Above not finished because there's no way to turn off the pad on my wife's netbook. You bravely press ahead, fearlessly ignoring what's happening to someone else's body.
I wonder what Dr. Pesek understands about just what constitutes malpractice. So, she had all the side effects of a real cancer treatment, without actually getting the part where it cures you. What was the point? Yes, if they are properly documented in a PubMed indexed case study by a reputable qualified researcher. So do please try to answer my question by providing those PubMed indexed papers.
So people with type 1 diabetes do better without insulin? So do provide where they are being killed in the numbers that equal those that occurred during the first two decades of the 20th century. The plural of anecdotes is not data. And why should we believe you? Provide the PubMed indexed studies to prove your point, or just move on. While the plural of anecdote is not data, I do have a couple of examples for you. Because of the discovery and someone figuring out to manufacture insulin Elizabeth Hughes , along with thousand of other children were able to grow, get married, have children and live a full life.
Because a surgeon at the Mayo Clinic performed a septal myectomy on my son to remove the excessive heart muscle that was close to blocking his aortic valve, we no longer have calls to our house. Cured my cancer myself, twenty years ago Chemo side effects is more cancer.. Doctors and scientist in it for money they make thousands of dollars from chemo, thats how they get rich they dont care about you they care about money What good are dietary changes and supplements going to do if the problem is nematodes and the spirochetes they harbor?
Wow, they are just crawling out of the woodwork. BreBurey, I'm not even sure why I'm answering you. I've heard and read all your nonsense before. You "stopped all processed toxins like msg", a substance that is naturally present in citrus fruits, Parmesan cheese, and human breast milk. Aspartame doesn't get absorbed from the gut into the blood, and its metabolites are naturally present in many foods.
Cancer is NOT "a fungus". If you had bothered to learn some actual facts, you'd know how to tell the difference Hint: None of your other claims stand up, either. You have no knowledge of science; you ought to actually learn some before you come here and peddle your story to people with actual medical and scientific training. Then you come out with the old nonsense about "Doctors and scientist in it for money they make thousands of dollars from chemo, thats how they get rich they dont care about you they care about money".
You don't know any more about medical people than you know about science. Since you claim to have cured your own cancer, if you reply please tell us what kind of cancer you had, how you knew it was cancer, and what stage was it at when found. As an ER nurse I have seen people literally butchered by their cancer surgeons. I have seen post op infections that look like something out of a horror movie. How egotistical to believe that cutting someone open or poisoning them with chemo are the only answers. I cured my lupus with nutrition after suffering thru modern medicines approach to my illness.
I firmly believe I wouldn't be alive today, at 60, had I continued on the modern medicine path I was on in The body is an amazing machine and nature provided for us. We have poisoned our way into being the sickest developed nation in the world. If what Ty teaches is quackery, then why are some of the most prestigious medical centers now supporting functional medicine and natural healing?
Places like Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins? You need to check your ego at the door and get your head out if your butt. Thanks for posting the press release. That's the kind of research that cries out for further exploration. Unfortunately, it's also the kind of information that quacks typically exploit in selling their wares. I can just see it now: Without so much as having determined either the efficacy, safety, or bioavailability of substance A, the gullible are targeted to take it and believe the bull the quack believes.
Along the same line of investigation, repurposing drugs used to treat cancer for the treatment of parasitic diseases may yield useful "alternative" medicines. You are persevering in confusing overdiagnosis with mammography-induced breast cancer. I don't know how to state it more clearly. If you have a careful look to the Hiroshima paper, and not just the abstract, you will see figure 7 , that cancer incidence after irradiation increases much earlier than you believe.
I juiced three times a day, had lots of baking soda, and stopped all processed toxins like msg aspartame, bht sulfates, stop and think about how cancer is a fungus.. I'm gonna guess that Willpower came into the cure as well. And Purity of Essence. So I try to help with little bits of information and point of view so they can improve their commentary and questions. Likewise, I discuss these questions that might be more answerable and productive in the future "to better separate the wheat from the chaff. There was localized complete necrosis on a bunch of mesenteric - peritoneal matter following a nonstandard neoadjunctive treatment before an R2 resection for CRC.
We had several drs and surgeons on three coasts asked if they had seen that before, "no". Even an oncologist that snickered at me about molecular entities the first time me met, suggested this unprompted. As for your questions, try to remember Deep Throat's advice: It appears that someone's posted a link to this post in a pro-alt med discussion forum of some sort.
We have an influx of newb trolls. I doubt you've seen anyone "literally butchered" since that would involve reducing them to assorted cuts of meat with all internal organs separated.
But you've probably seen people experience amputations due to cancer surgery, which is tragic but the alternative is to let the cancer kill them. Post op infections can occur with any operation; they are not unique to cancer surgery. And if you want to see something out of a horror movie, well, you could check out the links in this post:.
Buy "Mastectomy Recovery" Master Series boxed set.: What your doctors don't have time to tell you!: Read 7 Books Reviews - www.farmersmarketmusic.com "Mastectomy Recovery" Master Series boxed set.: What your doctors don't have time to tell you!: What your doctors don't have time to tell you! More information.
I only looked at the first few as I do not have a strong stomach. But the patient there didn't get cut open or suffer a post-op infection, so it's all good, right? First of all not all Alternative doctors are quacks and I hate that word. If one uses this word, there are quacks I have come to find out in the regular medical world too. Most doctors do the standard treatment for breast cancer and most doctors do not know very much about nutrition or supplements or any other kinds of treatments.
I hate when people say coming out of the woodworks too for there are those who actually can help themselves with any illnesses. Our bodies have that capabilities if you let it have it with a great immune system. Lots of nurses feel this way. You have to get to the root of the problem. When our bodies get sick in anyway, your immune systems is very low your body is lacking something. I am 62 and take NO drugs and most doctors can't believe this now days. I am not against medicine when needed.
I like doctors that have open minds, not one direction only. Bravo to all the internet trolls Posting responces with different names You should really search for references to DCIS in this blog. It's been discussed before. Your decision not to be treated may not be as bad as it first appears. Actually, I'd never say that all stories presumably about how people didn't use the current standard of care yet turned out fine are fake. They may well be true, so far as the person knows. What they probably don't know - in any provable way - is whether their actions affected the course of the disease in any way.
If you have proof, please share. I think our RI friends are too quick to dis miss points about immune function, partial responses, improved functionality and improved quality of life. Likewise, the new guests may have too great faith in their experiences as being curative rather than improved functionality and often temporary or partial responses. I've seen several alternative treatments with really impressive partial responses to disseminated cancer on scans, but were not sustained or sustainable alone.
To me, and in print from CAM drs that I find most credible and most prepared, the question is how to mix biological modalities optimally. For surgery, the smart patients are getting the most aggressive, talented surgeons they can find to blow past "inoperable" and still have reasonable risk with good recoveries. This also means finding ways to implement therapeutic nutrition in more aggressive forms for faster recoveries, fewer complications, and stronger, more perfect fusions.
For chemo and RT, this means getting minimal impact but higher activity combinations with the CAM stuff, demonstrable in real time. We don't know how reliable your evidence is, because you haven't actually presented any evidence. Evidence would include saying who had been treated, with what methods, how many of them were cured, and with what side effects. Also, there are no rules against a person talking about their own diagnosis or treatment as in the news story that started this thread.
But somehow there are plenty of people who are willing to get up and say "I used Thus-and-Such Miracle Treatment, and look at me!
Right now, we've got such cherry-picked results that they're useless: One important thing with CAM is the potential to keep antimetastatic, high immune and chemo activity in place, 24 x on smaller, disseminated residual cancers with high quality of life and good CBC values. In comparison, current cyclical treatments typically create hardened, voracious mets that grow and spread like wildfire during the tx gaps. Also the side effects are often substantial in terms of functionality, organ damage, quality of life, immunity and CBC. The patients are typically worn out in yrs.
One will often be quickly confronted by adverse changes if you are off track or inadequately performing. If you're not way ahead of the curves, you get buried under them. One of the problems of conventional chemo and RT is that damage and noise destroy much of the sensitivity and utility many blood tests. While on long term chemo If you were a life long anemic female and now Hgb is without iron pills, maybe you're doing something right.
If you were diabetic or borderline before, and now you are running HgbA1C 4. The overall effect is a word-salad of random snippets from NEJM. Without evidence, I tend to disbelieve all statements about immune function. This is not because I don't believe in immune function. Nor do I believe that immune function is irrelevant in responding to a disease, even one like cancer.
Most statements made about the how strengthening immune function fail to address some key issue for me. CAM being more permissive may follow extensive older or foreign literature not designed for current FDA requirements. How do you measure immune function? Outside well funded lab work, you don't. Rather you have common incomplete, indirect, qualitative and negative indicators. Wound healing, various infections or absence, gut epithelial shed, WBC, absolute differential counts and ratios, general inflammation levels, C and D vitamin deficiencies or levels.
I don't usually use that word because of derangements in cancer and autoimmune illness. The immune aspect modulates chemo activity to the extent the Japanese long referred to "immunochemo".
Also the ability to stay on continuous chemo when everyone else skips and quits years earlier due febrile neutropenia and infections like pneumonia, if not thrombocytopenia or anemia, is important. What did the chicken need baking soda for? Would that be the same immune system that has let countless humans die in epidemics of cholera, smallpox, measles, bubonic plague, yellow fever, Ebola fever, etc.?
Or the immune system that turns on its 'owner' with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, Graves' disease, lupus, SSPE, anaphylaxis? Or the immune system that produces leukemia and lymphoma? In my career I worked or substantial periods in medical and radiation oncology, and had significant exposure to hematology and surgical oncology. When I was found to have cancer, I immediately opted for surgery. The only reasons I didn't choose radiation was that I was young enough to have a reasonable chance of living to have the longterm effects of radiation, and that radiation after surgery has better results than surgery after radiation should I have a recrudescence of the cancer.
I was unafraid to make the choice among recognized modalities because I was familiar with the facts. People who have actually worked with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are far less afraid of them than people who aren't really familiar with the facts. I shouldn't be surprised to keep hearing the old "cut, burn, and poison' trope. Many people can't handle the idea that there really is no royal road to a cure and that sometimes survival means a fight, not a kale smoothy.
This is how information is disseminated in the biomedical world. I trust you recognise that anecdotes aren't sufficient. I never really understood the kale craze, still less the thing about putting it in smoothies. Smoothies ought to be sweet, kale belongs in caldo verde. It continues to bother me why they so easily accept this when there is so much evidence to the contrary. Think of how many have died and would die without antibiotics and antivirals. On some level I think it is a fear of the unknown and of losing control.
IOW, it is patients in denial and an attempt to keep their autonomy and not a righteous belief that they know better than medical professionals. Of course, the ones selling the alt treatments are a different story. The graph of survival in untreated breast cancer shows 1 in 5 patients survivng 5 years, 1 in 5 of those survivors still alive at 10 years, and 1 in 5 of those ten year survivors still alive at 15 years!
It shows that there will be testimonials from some 10 and 15 year survivors even if they only use ineffective 'treatments'. The people convinced by survivor stories need to learn about survivorship bias " https: You reminded me of how I once attended a lecture on evaluating statistics in which the lecturer talked about what she called the Helpful Dolphin Effect. She said we had all heard stories of dolphins coming to the aid of shipwrecked sailors. What we couldn't know is whether dolphins dragged an equal or greater number of shipwrecked sailors farther out to sea and drowned them.
Each e-book can be purchased separately or as a boxed set. Kindle Edition , 54 pages. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about "Mastectomy Recovery" book 7 "Understanding Lymphedema with Breast Cancer" , please sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Oct 08, SF. Pantano rated it it was amazing. This is a must read for all women and men who are dealing with Breast Cancer. It is packed with wonderful down-to-earth information about Lymphedema.
It is easy to read and follow. Will be checking out the other books in the series as well. Jamie Laster rated it it was amazing Feb 09, Kathy Campbell rated it it was amazing May 03, Aloha marked it as to-read Mar 10, Learn more at Author Central. All Formats Kindle Edition Sort by: Popularity Popularity Featured Price: Low to High Price: High to Low Avg.
What your doctors don't have time to tell you! Available for download now. Provide feedback about this page. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Get to Know Us. English Choose a language for shopping.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.