Patterns of Constitutional Design: The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making

---

But not all constitutions involve the public, and some are drafted by a handful of leaders behind closed doors. Certainly, a central dimension on which constitution-making processes differ is the degree of public participation. Because the constitution is the highest level of lawmaking and provides the foundation for all lawmaking processes, it arguably requires the greatest possible level of legitimation in democratic theory.

In an ideal world, one might desire universal consent over the rules of society, a standard that is obviously impractical. Higher levels of participation are presumed to restrict the adoption of undesirable institutions and to protect prospective minorities in the democratic processes that are established.

Gabriel L. Negretto

Participation thus legitimates and constrains, substituting inclusive processes for universal consent to make effective government possible. Public participation in constitutional design often takes the form of a referendum on the final document as a whole. Available data suggest a significant trend, beginning in the early 20th century, toward seeking public ratification for draft constitutions.

Approval by referendum may be an increasingly popular mode of public involvement, but it is clearly a limited one in that it involves only a yes or no vote over a package of provisions.

Recommended For You

Since at least World War II , however, public participation in constitutional design has become more direct and has penetrated more deeply or at least earlier in the process. One common approach is to involve the public in selecting those who will draft or deliberate over aspects of the charter. The representative group may be a constituent assembly elected expressly for the purpose or a regular legislature that takes on the project in addition to other duties. Some constitutional processes have experimented with more bottom-up methods of direct democracy , such as the citizen initiative , in which ideas can bubble up from civil society.

Constitution-Making in Comparative Perspective - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics

Still another mode of participation involves direct consultation with the public or representative groups at various stages, which might occur before, during, or after the drafting of the initial text. The drafting phase seems to be especially crucial, given the effects of inertia in the later stages of the process, but it is also likely to be the least participatory, given the challenges of writing by committee, much less writing by nation.

Indeed, in some well-known cases, the public is excluded from the drafting process and not consulted at all. Such constitutions are usually presumed to have less involvement on the part of local actors and, hence, to be less legitimate.

Some scholars believe that international involvement creates disincentives to enforce the constitution locally, as actors will strategically acquiesce to conditions they have no intention of fulfilling simply to remove external oversight. External influence, however, need not be as blatant as it is in the case of occupation constitutions. Constitutional drafting often attracts international advisers and interests, be they donors, creditors, interested states, or the United Nations.

The prospect of future membership in the European Union , for example, led some eastern European countries to make modifications to their draft constitutions at the behest of the Council of Europe. Many accounts of foreign borrowing point to the decisive role of influential consultants who appear to be part of a cottage industry of constitutional advisers.

Constitution making is often undertaken during moments of crisis when states are at their most amenable to accepting foreign models and suggestions, and scholars have long noted a high degree of similarity across documents. The persistence of presidentialism in Latin America , the use of French and Westminster models of government in former colonies, and the use of national conferences in Francophone Africa are all examples of the diffusion of governmental forms. There are potentially consequential aspects of the process of constitutional engineering other than the identities of the actors involved.

Among those aspects are the circumstances that lead to the making of a constitution in the first place. Conventional wisdom holds that constitution making is generally coincident with a cataclysmic event of some kind, such as a war, a coup, an economic crisis, or a revolution. In fact, some evidence suggests that, although crises do frequently precede constitutional reform, the number of constitutions drafted in noncrisis situations is probably underestimated. The various socialist constitutions, such as those in the Soviet Union and and China , seem to follow the installation of new leaders, a practice that was often justified by the Marxist view of evolution in stages.

These different patterns, reflecting various degrees of crisis or continuity , will affect the process, creating an atmosphere of either urgency or deliberation. The process can also vary in terms of time involved. Both of those cases are distant outliers.

Patterns of Constitutional Design

On average, constitution making takes about 16 months. Anecdotally, constitution-making processes involving either a very short or very long amount of time seem to occur in non-democracies. Speedy processes do not allow sufficient time for mobilization of the public and civil society, whereas extended processes are unlikely to hold public attention for the duration. Another dimension on which processes differ is the size of the deliberative body, an issue that has also plagued those who design legislatures. The concern is that large bodies—which have the advantages of minimizing deal making and assuring representativeness—can be unwieldy and lead to collective action problems.

Speculation about the processes of constitutional design and adoption is common, but, because those processes vary along a number of identifiable dimensions, more rigorous analysis is possible. We welcome suggested improvements to any of our articles.

Constitutional engineering

You can make it easier for us to review and, hopefully, publish your contribution by keeping a few points in mind. Your contribution may be further edited by our staff, and its publication is subject to our final approval. Unfortunately, our editorial approach may not be able to accommodate all contributions.

Our editors will review what you've submitted, and if it meets our criteria, we'll add it to the article. If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

Patterns of Constitutional Design : The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us. Personal use only; commercial use is strictly prohibited. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Publications Pages Publications Pages.

Oxford Research Encyclopedias Politics. Constitution-Making in Comparative Perspective.

Don't have an account? Sign in via your Institution. Sign in with your library card.

Related Articles Constitutional Law.

• My Cute Shiba (A Learn to Read Picture Book for Kids) An easy reader series
• Rebecca at the Beach (Rebecca Series Book 1)
• Gut, dass es mich gibt (German Edition)
• MaXilista (Italian Edition)
• Los cuadernos de un amante ocioso (Spanish Edition)
• Hussein père et fils, les 20 années qui ont changé le Moyen Orient (Politique, idée, société) (French Edition)
• The Woman Who Loved Jesse James