We will update the information on our website as and when required. I always explained everything to my boss about the status of project as and when he asked. I never go to the cinemas, I just watch the movies at home as and when I need. He always carries with him a pocket diary and note down the thoughts as and when they comes to his mind. As and when the time comes we will go there to see the results.
Banks store and obtain the signature of owners as and when required. They provide best technical support to the customers as and when required. Origin No origin information available about this phrase. Idiom of the Day cold feet cold feet Meaning Synonyms loss of courage failure of confidence to hesitate a lot suddenly become too frightened to do something one had planned to do Example Recent Comments Syeda on Nouns Joshua Price on a penny saved is a penny earned Vishal on hit the sack Aditya on a burnt child dreads the fire Anonymous on cat got your tongue.
For example, the content of Wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable sources ; the notability of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature, which are independent of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail not just "mere mentions" ; and in order to establish that the content is not original research , the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources.
This template no longer applies once a single reference appears in the article, whether placed through the preferred method of inline citations , ones appearing in a general references section, or even through such a poor method as including an embedded raw link. To address the issue, add citations to reliable sources. Because of their importance, Wikipedia contains numerous instruction pages on aspects of referencing. We suggest starting with Help: Referencing for beginners and Help: Citing sources for a more involved treatment, noting that each contains see also sections linking to additional help pages, guides and tutorials.
For multiple use of a single reference, the opening ref tag is given a name, like so: Each time you want to use that footnote again, you simply use the first element with a slash, like so: Per our style guidelines , the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated "References" located after the body of the article. Multiple [3] citation [3] use. As noted higher on this page , unless you thoroughly source a page in response to this template, it may more appropriate to switch this template with a more specific one rather than simply removing it.
This template no longer applies once an article has been made fairly well sourced. To address the issue, add additional inline citations to reliable sources for all significant statements in the article. Whether or not an article has been rendered "fairly well sourced" may involve a judgement call, but in any event, the sources used must be reliable ones, and articles should not rely predominantly on primary sources , but rather on secondary sources. Inline citations make verifiability accessible.
In short, in the absence of an inline citation that associates specific material to a specific source, it becomes very difficult for a reader to check what sources, given in only some general manner, verify what items of content. To address the issue, add inline citations to reliable sources , ideally for all significant statements in the article. Note that at a minimum: There are many instruction pages that directly and indirectly give guidance on adding inline citations.
Primary sources have their place but they must be used carefully and are easy to misuse.
Typically, they should only be used for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. They should not be used to support content that presents interpretation, analysis, evaluation, or synthesis, and should not be the predominant form of sourcing in an article.
Moreover, primary sources are generally not useful to demonstrate a topic's notability. To address the issue, add citations predominantly to secondary sources. Often this involves replacing some of the primary sources with secondary sources, and not just adding them alongside existing ones—especially where the primary source is being used for an invalid purpose such as interpretive claims and synthesis. If insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a topic in substantive detail, then Wikipedia should not have an article on the topic.
Remember that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia , a specific type of reference work properly containing articles on topics of knowledge. Wikipedia employs the concept of notability to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics by attempting to ensure that the subjects of articles are "worthy of notice" — by only including articles on topics that the world has taken note of by substantively treating them in reliable sources unconnected with the topic.
The general notability standard thus presumes that topics are notable if they have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject ". As stated in the template, addressing the issue requires adding citations to reliable secondary sources. There are a number of common mistakes seen in addressing this issue:. For example, such articles may tell users to buy a company's product, provide price lists, give links to online sellers, use unencyclopedic or meaningless buzzwords , be filled with peacock language and read like the website of the article's topic or a press release touting its virtues, rather than that of a neutrally -written encyclopedia article about the topic.
Though not always the case, a common denominator in promotional articles is the creator having some personal involvement with the topic. To address the issue, rewrite the article from a neutral point of view — which is not just about the wording and tone but also as to what the article covers and what it does not cover.
Wikipedia articles should represent fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Removing all promotional language is a good start but depending on what is left, may only be a surface treatment. See what you can salvage but often there is little alternative but to strip out all content that is not reliably sourced, leaving it in a stub state. The ideal, of course, is to explore the existence of sourcing for the topic and build from the ground up.
An unbalanced or non-neutral article is one that does not fairly represent the balance of perspectives of high-quality, reliable secondary sources. This tag is meant to be accompanied by an explanation on the article's talk page about why it was added, identifying specific issues that are actionable within Wikipedia's content policies.
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. You may remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:. The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. A good lead section cultivates the reader's interest in reading more of the article, but not by teasing the reader or hinting at content that follows. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable , and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.
To address the issue, write a lead section. The size of an appropriate lead will depend on the breadth of the article but it should be no more than four well-composed paragraphs, and should generally not contain content that is not already present in the body of the article. Current event templates warns editors and readers about an article that is the subject of a current event, such as a breaking news story , that is accordingly experiencing a great flux of edits and is in a fast-changing state.
Wikipedia attracts numerous editors who want to update articles in real time immediately after such current events are published. However, sources to breaking news reports often contain serious inaccuracies, and so these templates can also draw attention to the need to add improved sources as soon as they become available. The template should generally be removed when the event described is no longer receiving massive editing attention.
If the article continues to have sourcing or cleanup issues, a more appropriate maintenance template should be used instead. As noted previously, most templates contain links to guidance pages. Additionally, many templates have documentation that provides more information about the template's flagged issue, which is displayed when you visit the template page itself.
To access the template and thereby see its documentation, type into the search field Template: The first "parameter" is the name of the template. The accompanying documentation for all maintenance templates, if it exists, can be located in this way. If you've read through this page and are still confused about what needs to be done to fix an issue on a page and remove a maintenance template, try asking at the Teahouse , a page designed for new users to ask questions. Alternatively, you could try the more general Help desk , or seek live assistance at the IRC channel: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Responsible tagging and Wikipedia: This help page is a how-to guide. It details processes or procedures of some aspect s of Wikipedia's norms and practices.
It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines , as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. December Learn how and when to remove this template message. The example below shows three different issues flagged by this template: Visual inline citation guide.
Formatting references using inline citations All information in Wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources. Our preferred method of citation is using the " cite. Using this method, each time a particular source is mined for information don't copy word-for-word!
Inline citation code; what you type in 'edit mode' What it produces when you save Two separate citations. This article needs additional citations for verification. This article includes a list of references , related reading or external links , but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. This article relies too much on references to primary sources.
Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline.