Three Little Pigs

---

I read this book when I was little and I liked it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bill Bo — September 3, The Original Story form the Library of Congress http: Shannon angle — September 9, I loved the history read by you, Natasha. Thanks for the opportunity to travel with you. In the Three Little Kittens, there are three cats who are trying to please their mother, just as the three pigs go out into the world to please their mother in this story.

A major difference between the two stories, however, is that all three kittens act as one collective unit, either doing well for themselves finding and cleaning their mittens , or doing poorly losing and spoiling their mittens. Although the pigs also either do well or poorly for themselves, they do it individually, as each pig builds his house with a different material, and each pig has a different encounter with the wolf.

Both stories end happily, however, as the Three Little Kittens get to eat a rat for dinner, and the last little pig gets to eat a wolf for dinner. Compared to the traditional version of the story, it stays very close to the original and varies only slightly with minor plot details.

His retelling does not involve the death of any pigs, and the pigs display manners by acknowledging to give something in return for the materials they receive. In this version the three pigs as well as the wolf stayed alive. They both have the same setting, however, and are closely related. I like the way they made their houses.

I like the story v. The third pig is so clever. Natasha is an excellent story teller. Please give us more nice stories. In my opinion, you help us a lot, the parents, and provide us with qualitative material for teaching them. In the original version, the wolf is seen as the evil character but in my version of the tale the wolf is seen as a misrepresented character.

In both cases, the language was engaging but the final outcome was very different. I like both versions of the story and find them fun to read. I prefer reading the Bishop book because it contains very vibrant pictures that help with the simplicity of the plot. They illustrate the events of the book in great detail and make the story come to life. Only a few words differ from the story written above. The language in this book is very lively and engaging. The reader will want to find out what happens next to the three little pigs. There is new vocabulary in the story in which children will want to find out more about.

The Three Little Pigs by Gavin Bishop follows the traditional version of the story of the three little pigs. The plot and theme are the same. Both tellings have a simple and direct plot which follows the path of a hungry wolf and three pigs off to seek their fortune. Both stories share the theme that in order to out-trick a trickster you have to think like them.

The language is both lively and engaging, but uses more modern language than the original. Also, the illustrations compliment the story well. They both have simple and direct plots, however the end of the stories take very different turns. In the other version that I read, the wolf is framed and is trying to defend himself by telling his story of being sick and asking his neighbors for sugar, but finding the pigs already dead and eating them for dinner.

In this story, the wolf gets eaten at the end, which is very different than the one I read and an interesting plot twist, so it was a retelling of the original. Both were great stories to read.

Navigation menu

The original version of Three Little Pigs has inspired multiple variant books in the following years. He had a cold and was only going over the pigs homes to borrow a cup of sugar. Basically, this traditional story that has been passed down orally and part of the beauty of it is that there can be many retellings and variations of the same three little pig story.

These three little pigs and that one big bad wolf will continue to entertain us for years. So thanks for sharing a wonderful version of the story. In comparing this to other versions of the story, it is interesting to see the parts from this story here that are changed or left out.

Instead of being a story about resourcefulness, the story now is about misunderstanding people and finding out the true story. I definitely recommend it! The retelling completely twists the story of the Three Little Pigs and depicts the pigs as the bad guys. The pigs were extremely rude to him, and each time he sneezed their houses would fall down on top of them. The traditional story of the three little pigs suggests that the wolf was evil and the third pig was clever to outsmart him. The re-telling suggests that the pigs were inconsiderate of the wolf and if they had only been friendly, everyone could have had a happy ending.

The re-telling emphasizes that everything is not always as it seems and we should look at both sides of a story. The plots of both stories are simple and direct, but the re-telling uses more lively and engaging language to appeal to young readers. It stays true to the plot of the original tale but sets the story in the southwest region of the United States in modern times. The pigs also take on the form of javelinas, a southwest cousin of the traditional American farm pig.

The Three Little Javelinas message, however, is the same.

Rate this page

To me, the original version is a little too drastic to read to young children. In comparing the two versions compared above, the variant version is a little less violent, but still mirrors the original story. However, both books contain the criteria for being Traditional Fantasy.

The story by Gavin Bishop has excellent illustrations that compliment the story while using a simple plot and engaging language. Additionally, this online original tale has been passed down orally. I had never read about the pig out tricking the wolf and going to all those places right before the wolf would arrive. This book is a retelling of the original three little pigs. The book has illustrations that extend the story.

The plot in the story above is more simple and direct. The story above is engaging especially at the end, when the pig is tricking the wolf. In The True story of the Three Little Pigs the story is lively and engaging because it gives the reader a different perspective of the Three Little Pigs. After reading this story as well as the retelling of Three Little Javelinas I realized there were some substantial differences.

In the Three Little Pigs the wolf eats the first two pigs, but in the Three Little Javelinas the first two pigs escape to the third little pigs house.

The third pig did not eat the wolf in the Three Little Javelinas. He was simply burned and ran away. Also the Three Little Javalinas used tumbleweed instead of straw, sticks from a dried up cactus, and adobe bricks. This retelling represents the culture of the desert and uses specific details in both its language and its illustrations to expand the story. This is an excellent resource for reading the more traditional fairytale of the three little pigs. Looking at the criteria for evaluating traditional fantasy this version has a fairly simple plot with more complicated actions against the wolf by the third pig.

Some may also classify it as a fractured tale because it does not have quite the same plot as the coyote is not killed in the end of the book.

Raymond at the grill

This story does not keep with the language f the traditional tale as listed under the criteria for traditional fantasy. Because the ending is not identical between the variations the moral would not be the same. The theme of the Three Little Javelinas is more about giving the students a way to explain why the coyotes howl at night.

Overall, both variations are good stories. WOW natasha thanks very much amazing story reading really love thanks the story is quite intresting thankyou EbtesaM. EbtesaM — April 21, Bertie — April 30, Williams — May 10, I like that story,who ever wrote this. I like the part when the little pig who built that house out of bricks got to heaps of places before the wolf. Sophie, Emilia, California — July 14, Axel quintero — July 24, I really liked this version of the three little pigs. I thought that the character development of the last little pig was good; how he was shown as sly and intelligent made him likeable and interesting to children.

Though some may find this story as too gruesome for some younger age groups. I liked the unexpectedness of the story above, students would have to take their time when predicting how the pig will triumph over the wolf. It would be great to use for beginning to teach students critical thinking skills, sequencing of events, and character development.

I enjoyed listening to this classic tale of the Three Little Pigs because I had forgotten how the story progressed. Recently, I read a different variant to the original tale of the Three Little Pigs. I read the Three little Pigs by Gavin Bishop. The original tale does make the family poor. Although it was different however, the original and the one told by Gavin Bishop are almost identical and can both be considered quality traditional fantasy literature.

The story line of both stories was the same where the wolf wanted to eat the pigs, and pigs one and two are not as prepared or smart as the third pig, so their houses were blown down. However, the difference between the original Three Little Pigs and The Three Ninja Pigs is that in the latter, the pigs study some form of self-defense and that is how they ward off the wolf- not by the material of their house.

When reading the Three Little Pigs, I was initially surprised about how grim it was. I had never realized that the last little pig had so many encounters with the Wolf. I picked it because I thought that it was a variant, but I soon realized there was no common basis between the works. I did find similarities. This novel details the experiences of the author in the foster care system. Like the pigs, Courter had to deal with many wolves through her life. Initially she hid by avoiding doing anything wrong to avoid punishment.

The wolf in the story was named Mrs. She was particularly cruel and did horrible things to her and other children. Even after leaving the home, she was haunted by memories and reminders of this woman. Only when she took Mrs. Moss head on in a law suit could Courter be free from the hurt inflicted on her and to make sure that no other child would ever be hurt again. Just like this, only when the pig takes the Wolf head on can he defeat the wolf. I sincerely enjoyed listening to The Three Little Pigs and appreciated the fact that this story is able to be well translated and understood when spoken.

This type of literature facilitates good practical experience with listening to texts which allows students to practice their listening and comprehension skills. I also had the opportunity to read a retelling of this beloved story called The Three Little Javelinas which had a very similar plot with a slight twist: This particular story is a retelling due to the fact that although the basic premise of the story is the same, many major parts are different such as the three different materials [brick, straw and sticks] and the presence of a wolf were concepts that were not in the retelling of the story.

The original telling of The Three Little Pigs as presented on storynory is classified as a traditional fantasy, since the original source of the story is unknown and it was passed down initially through oral tradition. I read a similar pig story, Small Pig by Arnold Lobel, which is a modern fantasy as opposed to a traditional fantasy. This story was created by the author, and recorded in print through publishing in Although these stories are both fantasies about pigs, they are quite different in composition, development, and theme.

While The Three Little Pigs may be seen as a warning to build sturdy defenses, Small Pig focuses more on taking time to settle in places of comfort, and pursuing that comfortable place when it disappears, which provides a very deep conversational question. I would suggest reading it if you have not.

The plot is simple, but complex in the details that have been changed. The message is that the big, bad pig just wanted friends to have around him. The language is lively and has many interesting differences that I do not think are based on the culture of the time. The common Three Little pigs was very straight forward and simple, where as in my retelling the pigs are playing games, use modern building supplies, somewhat violent, and mentioned a tea leaves in their tea-pot often.

This story reversed the common role of the scary wolf and innocent pigs. The Illustrations closely compliment the story as well as the original story. If one were to simply look at the illustrations they might think that they were reading the original story. The Wolf in this story is defending his case.

Instead of angrily blowing down the houses he uses the excuse that he has a cold and is sneezing down each house. I believe that this book represents modern values, the book plays off the deaths of the pigs as accidents instead of brutal murders. Overall, the plot is simple and direct and engaging with the oral tradition of the original book. He goes on to explain how the wolf is actually framed for simply asking for some sugar for his grandma! In the original telling, the wolf is the antagonist trying to eat the three little pigs whereas the wolf in this story is disguised as a child in a wolf costume.

The plot is, however, both simple and direct, but they are not the same at all. The original story is a progression of the relationship between the pigs and the bad wolf where the wolf loses in the end. They are two very different stories that happen to share a similar animal which is a wolf. Unlike the original version, listened to above, the story does a role reversal and puts the pig in charge with the wolves cowering in their homes. Continuing with the modern twist, the wolves build houses out of brick, cement, armor plated steel, and finally flowers.

All of the manmade structures anger the pig, leading to destruction and fear. However, once the wolves embrace nature in their flower house, the pig calms down and everyone lives happily ever after. The plot itself, although altered, still follows the general guidelines set forth by the original story. There are still three scared animals and one grumpy one.

The story by Gavin Bishop does not begin quite the same as the original in that in this version, the 3 little pigs are living with their mother Mrs. Pig and she decides that they must move out on their own not because they are poor and must seek their fortunes but because in the picture the little pigs are all lounging by their in ground swimming pool while their mother is mowing the grass.

The ending of the story is also a bit different because it does not finish with the explicit information that the pig ate the wolf but it is implied through the illustration of the pig holding his enlarged stomach after dinner in satisfaction. Overall, the story uses language that is lively and keeps true to the oral tradition, only varying in very slight ways. I particularly enjoyed this very twisted rendition of the three little pigs. I loved the dimension that the end of the story brings to this classic story. In comparison to the others versions that I have read about the three little pigs this definitely has to be my favorite.

It takes on the traditional story of the three little pigs and as the story progresses the story begins to change. The three pigs leave there story and enter into other traditional fairy tales as they run away from the big bad wolf. This rendition concludes with the pigs returning to their original story with all their friends they collected along the way. Both stories held the same story frame work of the three little pigs but had very differing endings.

In evaluating this story in comparison to the original I conclude that this story follows all criteria needed to be a variant to the original. You could make a comparison between this novel and The Three Little Pigs, as told on storynory, as there are three of them. In order to remain safe, the guinea pigs pretend to be boring. In the end of this tale, the three guinea pigs are reunited and are all owned by the former wolf. This is not an echo of The Three Little Pigs as they never become friends of the wolf in the original tale.

The Three Little Guinea Pigs is a modern fantasy tale. Fantasy elements that are present are characterization as the guinea pigs are portrayed with human characteristics. The story is believable though as it appears as if that could have been the thought process of the animals. The Three Little Pigs, retold and illustrated by Gavin Bishop, was aligned with the Storynory version as it is simple and direct.

There is a slight variant on the traditional story by it beginning with Mrs. Pig deciding it was time for her pigs to leave home. This story possessed the original content of one pig choosing to make a straw house and another building a stick house. Both of these pigs had their houses destroyed by the Wolf and were eaten by him. The last little pig, as in the original story, built his house out of bricks, and much to the chagrin of the Wolf, he was unable to blow the house down.

The story ended as the original, with the Pig boiling a pot, the Wolf scrambling down the chimney, and the little Pig eating the Wolf right up! I enjoyed this story by the Brothers Grimm very much. The story was captivating and the language lively and enchanting. However, many children might find this version disturbing because the eats the wolf in the end.

In that version, the wolves build their house out of bricks, then cement, then steel, and the pig destroys each house. When they decide to build it out of flowers, the pig smells the flowers and decides to stop pursuing the wolves and make friends with them instead. This version would appeal to modern audiences more than the Grimm version because the villain changes his ways rather than being overcome by the protagonist.

However, there are also many differences. Further, the materials that the wolves use to build the house are different bricks, concrete, barbed wire, and then flowers. The pig is able to destroy all of the houses except for one-the house made of flowers. In the end, the pig and the wolves become friends.

Although the classic and modified versions are so different, they both employ lively and engaging language. They also both convey a theme of perseverance and the modified version illuminates the importance of friendship. This retelling is close to the original in certain aspects. In the retelling, the houses of straw and sticks get blown down by the wolf, and the wolf eats the pigs that lived in each house. When the wolf came to the brick house, he was unable to blow it down.

In contrast to the original tale, the story that I read was from the point of view of the wolf, and he claimed that his powerful sneezes caused the first two houses to collapse and that the pigs were found dead once the smoke of the houses collapsing cleared and simply decided to not let the pig go to waste. Finally, instead of the wolf falling down the chimney into a boiling pot, the wolf in the retelling was arrested. But then it turns out that they are just throwing a surprise birthday party for the wolf rather than hiding in fear of him. It was a awesome book to read………………………….

THE END that is what the author should do then it would beat golden goose and the boy who cried wolf thanks p. April 30th, and May 2nd, has very inappropriate names that may have slipped by without being noticed. My daughter was reading the comments and saw this and I was hoping you could take these down.

I enjoyed listening to this traditional version of the Three Little Pigs. Instead of a wolf antagonist, humans are the enemy!

These three guinea pigs are best friends and fear being bought from the pet store to different owners. This version is much shorter than the traditional and has a happy ending for all three pigs, not just one. Overall, I really enjoyed listening to this version and having an opportunity to compare it to a modern retelling of the classic. After reading the traditional version of the Three Little Pigs I was surprised at the differences from the story I thought was the traditional version.

Further, it was very different from another version Newton and the Three Little Pigs. While the rest of the story the wolf tried to deceive the last brother pig who made his house out of bricks and blow his house in unsuccessfully. Instead in this story the wolf tried to deceive the pig by getting him to leave his house and eat him not having as much to do with the house itself.

Similarly in both stories the pig ultimately deceived the pig. I loved hearing this traditional fantasy story. I had never heard the full version which included the turnips, apple tree, and the fair. This story is clearly a fable, because the few characters are animals with impersonal personalities who speak as humans. It is a simple story which conveys the complex ideas of being careful with strangers and careful with who you trust.

This tale reverses the traditional roles to add humor and irony. The themes and morals are different, allowing the antagonist to have a change of heart. After listening to this story I was shocked at how different it was. Although the characters are the same, there are many differences. For example none of the characters die, they are all good, and the pig does not try to trick the wolf or scare him.

Both versions of the Three Little Pigs have similar characters, settings, and theme. It is exciting to explore the different versions to stories! Although they have the same storyline each version showcases creativity and surprise. This story was great compared to all the variations of this story that I have read in the past. In this variation the the wolf was the protagonist and the pigs were the antagonists. It was more a story of coincidence while this much more traditional story had more developed and active characters who drove the story. I loved how cleaver the last pig was and how this version created multiple chances for him to show off his cleverness.

Lastly I enjoyed how this book had a bit of a dark twist or justice even when the wolf got boiled alive.

The Three Little Pigs

Such a cute story! This version of the Three Little Pigs stays very true to the traditional version of the story. The story is simple and predictable, however parts sure do surprise the reader! The story themes classify as typical and the story line incorporates some repeated patterns and elements.

Unique characteristics present in folktales are also evident in this version of the story. Specifically, a unique characteristic of folktales found in this story is trickery motifs involving animals or humans who trick friends and neighbors. Trickster tales are part of almost every cultures. This story is very cute and enjoyable for a wide audience of multiple age ranges!

Our trailer artwork

I really enjoyed listening to this read-aloud of the three little pigs tale. Sticking with the trickery motif and talking animals, Bishop only differs from the original tale by a few words. This unique rendition features the characters contradicting how they are in the original tale.

I was surprised at how long this version of the Three Little Pigs is! The whole part about the wolf trying to trick the pig in the brick house into eating food and going to a carnival were comletely new to me. I really enjoyed this version with the manipulative wolf. I especially liked how the last pig outsmarted him so much. It was an unusual twist on the classic tale. I had never heard the middle parts of this story before! The plot points where the wolf kept trying to trick the last pig at the carnival, picking berries, etc.

It seemed pretty repetitive, and it slowed down the middle of the story for me — I noticed my mind wandering while the wolf kept trying and trying to trick the pig. When transitioning to the conclusion of the story that I had heard before where the wolf falls into the pot of boiling water, the middle section seemed to end fairly abruptly! The connection was not very smooth. The reader read with great prosody! I think this story would be very engaging for young readers because of the quality of reading. This is a great story. I had never heard all of the ways the last pig tricks the wolf!

It made the story a lot longer than the other versions I had heard. This version was very different from one story about the three little pigs I recently read. He tries to explain how he is innocent! This story was great! But it seems changed from the version I remember. I remember none of the pigs dying and living in the brick house of the third pig.

I love the story it one of my fave rates I love it so much I want marry them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think you have remarked some very interesting points , appreciate it for the post. The wolf is trying to prove to the readers that he is not the bad guy, and that really the pigs are at fault.

But then the third pig is smart and has his house built in bricks so the wolf cannot come in, and the third pig ends up calling the police on him. This is where the original story and the variant are different because of the ending. In the original story, the first two pigs are eaten and then third one out smarts the wolf and actually ends up tricking him into a boiling pot of water and eats him for dinner.

In the ending of the variant, the third pig and the wolf are still alive. They are also different based off of the narrator. The original is told in third person, and the variant is told in first person. These are both great stories and the differences and similarities are what make them so unique and interesting for children to experience. This story has a lot of similarities to the retelling that I read by Gavin Bishop. The story stats off a little different though. It starts with Mrs. Pig deciding that it is time for her three sons to leave home. She then packs them each a lunch and sends them on their way to start a life on their own.

The story is very similar to the original because the pigs who build their houses out of straw and sticks both get eaten by the wolf. The pig who uses bricks to build his house ends up defeating the wolf just like it says in the original version. The only difference between this book and the original version is the beginning. Bertie — October 28, The framework of the story is similar between the retelling of the book and the original tale. The book is told in a completely different perspective. It is very interesting to see the difference in the story. It is a very humorous piece.

There is no citing of the original source, since it is very different from the original story. There is some violence in this story, but I think it is a better kind of violence than the kind present in the original story.

No character dies in this version; in fact, the characters become friends by the end of the story, showing more character growth and development than the original story. One of my favorite parts of this story were the illustrations. They were very bright and colorful and very prominent.

Some of the pictures took up entire pages. They really enhanced the plot of the story. I love this book. I even think I like it more than the original story. The plot is simple in the book which is good for younger readers. The story has a moral of do not trust the story without hearing the other side. Hearing both sides of the story will help you find out what really happened. The illustrations are very good and it helps to extend the story. The text is close to the original, it is just told from the wolfs side. However, like the original tale, the wolf was unable to blow the third house down!

Another difference, is that the three little javelinas were lucky enough to not get eaten. The wolf tries to out-smart the little javelinas by climbing down the stove pipe, but luckily the stove was on and the wolf got burnt and ran away, and so the three little javelinas lived happily ever after. In both stories the three pigs decide what kind of house to build and the wolf tried to blow the houses down. The main difference between the two is that there is a scientific element. The author added many details that are connected to physics. In the traditional three little pigs the antagonist is the Big Bad wolf and the protagonists are the three little pigs, but in the Three Little Wolves and the Big Bad Pig, the wolves are the protagonist and the pig is the antagonist.

The plot of both stories is similar except for the switch of the protagonist and antagonist. This version, that I read, is a retelling of the traditional story because it completely flips the characters and have a different outcome. The language is lively and engaging. I think that both stories are written well and have the ability to draw in young readers. The moral of the first book it to not talk to strangers, I think. Then the retelling the moral is that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar.

By this I mean that it took the pretty sweet smelling flowers for the wolves to turn the pig into a friend. The illustrations in the retelling are wonderful and add to the understanding and emotion of the story. I think that the retelling would be better to use to teach a lesson to young students.

I think that the original story of The Three Little Pigs represents the style of reading and such that was used when it was written while the The Three little Wolves and the Big Bad Pig shows more of the moral side and type of story we are familiar with today. However, both tales have the same ending of catching the wolf in the soup pot! The theme for every version seems to remain the same. The storynory tale aligns well the the original oral tradition, but I might alter the story depending on the age of my audience!

The Three Little Pigs by Gavin Bishop does not cite an original source but acknowledges that it is a retelling of the original. The plot is simple, as each set of problems introduces itself in a set of three. Some of the scenes can be a bit gruesome for children as in the Storynory version of the tale as well. Both of these versions The Three Little Pigs share a subtle theme about strangers to children. Though the wolf tried to get the third pig to come with him, the pig knew to stay inside where he was safe and go out when he was sure the wolf was not.

Children are reminded through this story never to go with strangers and stay in safety areas. This storynory of the Three Little Pigs was very well read and engaging classical version of how the story is originally told. In the original version, the three little pigs are each visited by the big, bad wolf and each have to defend themselves. The first pig builds a house out of hay, but then the wolf huffs and puffs to blow it down resulting in the first pig getting eaten.

The second pig builds a house of sticks, but the wolf huffs and puffs it down and eats the pig up! The end of the original version of The Three Little Pig then has the third pig outsmart the wolf by building a house out of brick and eventually trapping the wolf to kill him. The wolf continued down the lane and he passed by the second house made of sticks; and he saw the house, and he smelled the pigs inside, and his mouth began to water as he thought about the fine dinner they would make.

The wolf was greedy and he tried to catch both pigs at once, but he was too greedy and got neither! His big jaws clamped down on nothing but air and the two little pigs scrambled away as fast as their little hooves would carry them. The wolf chased them down the lane and he almost caught them. But they made it to the brick house and slammed the door closed before the wolf could catch them. The three little pigs they were very frightened, they knew the wolf wanted to eat them.

And that was very, very true. The wolf hadn't eaten all day and he had worked up a large appetite chasing the pigs around and now he could smell all three of them inside and he knew that the three little pigs would make a lovely feast. He puffed and he huffed. And he huffed, huffed, and he puffed, puffed; but he could not blow the house down.

At last, he was so out of breath that he couldn't huff and he couldn't puff anymore. The musical was specially written for the band K3 , who play the three little pigs, Pirky, Parky and Porky Dutch: Knirri, Knarri and Knorri. In , Peter Lund let the three little pigs live together in a village in the musical Grimm with Little Red Riding Hood and other fairy tale characters. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Three Little Pigs disambiguation. The wolf blows down the straw house in a adaptation of the story. Illustration by Leonard Leslie Brooke. The Three Little Pigs film.

Folklore and Mythology Electronic Texts. Retrieved 25 July The Annotated Classic Fairy Tales. The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories. Continuum International Publishing Group. The Three Little Pigs. List of pigs List of fictional pigs Piganino Pigasus politics " When pigs fly ". De 3 Biggetjes musical. The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs! San zhi xiao zhu Big Bad Wolf character. Retrieved from " https: Fictional pigs Fictional trios Fables English fairy tales English folklore Literature featuring anthropomorphic characters Animal tales Male characters in fairy tales Pigs in literature.

All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from May Articles with permanently dead external links CS1 Dutch-language sources nl All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from July Articles containing Dutch-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with LibriVox links. Views Read Edit View history. In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource.

• Das Konsumverhalten von Jugendlichen. Welche Rolle spielt das Internet? (German Edition)
• Gender-based Asylum Claims in Scandinavia: Comparing Policies and Practices
• Il silenzio non esiste (I Libri di Isbn/Guidemoizzi) (Italian Edition)
• Power In The Name
• El difícil arte de educar. Consejos prácticos para padres con hijos pequeños (Spanish Edition)
• The Vietnam Vet With 9 Lives
• The novel: what it is