Current Perspectives in Paediatric Urology (Clinical Practice in Urology)

---

This section publishes work on all aspects of Pediatric Urology, from experimental research to clinical papers. Pediatric Urology welcomes submissions of the following article types: All manuscripts must be submitted directly to the section Pediatric Urology, where they are peer-reviewed by the Associate and Review Editors of the specialty section. Articles published in the section Pediatric Urology will benefit from the Frontiers impact and tiering system after online publication.

Authors of published original research with the highest impact, as judged democratically by the readers, will be invited by the Chief Editor to write a Frontiers Focused Review - a tier-climbing article. This is referred to as " democratic tiering ". The author selection is based on article impact analytics of original research published in all Frontiers specialty journals and sections.

TIER 1 ARTICLE TYPES

Focused Reviews are centered on the original discovery, place it into a broader context, and aim to address the wider community across all of Surgery and Pediatrics. For all queries regarding manuscripts in Review and potential conflicts of interest, please contact pediatrics. For queries regarding Research Topics, Editorial Board applications, and journal development, please contact pediatrics frontiersin. Login Register Login using. You can login by using one of your existing accounts. We will be provided with an authorization token please note: This means that you will not need to remember your user name and password in the future and you will be able to login with the account you choose to sync, with the click of a button.

Fees Article types Author guidelines Review guidelines Submission checklist Contact editorial office Submit your manuscript Editorial board. About Frontiers Research Topics. Over the next 12 years there has been an overwhelming trend of conversion to a one-year general surgery training followed by a four-year urology stint. In fact, in all US urology programs but one required a four-year clinical urology training.

Developing a program for pediatric urological care in the community

In all others general surgery training is incorporated within the framework of a urology residency program. In fact, in three countries, namely, Estonia, Italy and Ukraine general surgery training is foregone altogether in favor of a purely urological training program. The mean time spent in general surgery training in European countries is A large number of residents, even in leading institutions of our country rue a deficiency of practical operating experience in our urology residency programs.

This lack of proper practical training is distressing - although not uniquely Indian. In a survey of laparoscopic training during residency, Duchene et al. Nevertheless, it is likely that Indian data on this aspect of our residency programs would present an alarming picture. Most of our institutions still lack a structured policy regarding the number and type of surgical procedures to be performed by residents in training.

Surgeries are allotted to residents in a relatively random fashion and the most important factor in this is the amount of trust and rapport a resident has been able to develop with the members of the faculty. Although this is not necessarily improper, it does introduce a discrepancy in the surgical exposure between two residents in the same or different departments. In our current residency system, by the time a resident comes into a situation where he would start getting some surgical freedom, it is time to go.

By increasing the number of years to be spent in the same department, the independent surgical exposure would definitely be enhanced and would go a long way in producing urologists who are more technically skilled than those coming out of residency programs today. Clinical and even basic science research is a vital component of a residency training program. Not only does it enrich the individual during training and thereafter, but also ensures growth and development of our specialty in the future. In the current three-year program, residents are often left performing a desperate balancing act between inpatient care, operating room duties, emergency calls and preparation for examinations leaving very little room and I dare say, inclination for research.

This is not only detrimental for the individual but also for the institution since the reputation of the institution and its stature in scientific circles is determined to a large extent by the publications emerging from it. This is indeed quite paltry as compared to the publications from institutions in the United States in these journals during the same time period.

Current Perspectives in Paediatric Urology

Though the reasons for this vast gap may be many, a general lack of time and facilities for urological research in India is definitely quite glaring. A six-year program with a dedicated research year would provide a greater opportunity to perform high quality research during the training period by ensuring a more rational time allocation to this aspect of residency training thereby resulting in an increase in the number of urological publications coming out of Indian academic institutions. I would concede that the current MBBS curriculum does not offer enough exposure to subspecialties like urology and that makes it difficult for medical students to choose a path that would lead to a direct five to six-year course after MBBS.

This doesn't however mean that the current three-year course in urology is adequate. It stresses on the fact that there is a need to change the way medical education is conducted at the undergraduate level. In order to assist the medical student in making a decision regarding the specialty to pursue after graduation, a structured curriculum needs to be formulated and implemented at the undergraduate level so as to ensure adequate exposure to subspecialties like urology.

The present portal of entry into a urological residency in India is fraught with uncertainty. After MBBS, at every stage, the prospect of a daunting entrance examination looms ahead. For an aspiring urologist, completion of a general surgery residency is just a means to an end. Even these examinations are not standardized. While some institutions ask pure urology, others want to test the candidates on their general surgery knowledge. Still others even put questions from biochemistry and gynecology in their entrance examinations. The candidates end up either riding two horses at the same time with a high chance of falling or have to forego some examinations altogether.

Introduction

Clearly, such a system causes an undue amount of stress and anxiety in the minds of these young surgeons and is counterproductive to our medical system. A clear-cut direct six-year course after MBBS will resolve much of these apprehensions and would allow the students to focus on their residency training rather than worry about an entrance examination at every step.

Moreover, it will also be helpful to the institutions since it would obviate the need to hold an entrance examination every year or six months to induct new urology trainees into their departments. In spite of having developed an interest in a surgical field during MBBS, many young medical graduates prefer disciplines like radiodiagnosis and dermatology to general surgery since they are wary and uncertain about their prospects of obtaining a residency position in a surgical subspecialty of their choice.

Dr. Papanikolaou’s perspective

In many of these cases they cannot be faulted for choosing safety over uncertainty. It is possible that our subspecialty i. So what are the changes that can potentially help us in establishing world-class urological training programs in India? I propose certain suggestions, which I hope, will stimulate a discussion in this regard. The main objectives behind these suggestions are to attract the best medical students into urology, to ensure a level playing field for all candidates while entering or exiting a urology residency program, to allocate the right amount of time between general surgery and urology and to establish a similar standard of training between all urology training programs in the country.

Till now, India and the Indian medical system have produced some of the finest surgeons and physicians in the profession. Indian urologists have scripted success stories in almost all rapidly emerging subspecialties of urology. However, at present there is an overwhelming need to change our training patterns with the changing times.

We must anticipate the future and rise to the challenges coming our way lest we get left behind in the race for urological expertise…and produce inadequately trained substandard urologists who will not be able to hold their own in the face of the changing urological scenario. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List Indian J Urol v. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

• At Last
• El Expatriado (Spanish Edition)
• tranny stories (1)
• Postmarked in Europe: Journal from 2005
• Rhoda: A Story Based on the Life and Times of Rhoda Elizabeth Waller Kilcrease Gibbes
• Auric the Great