Contents:
If something is still steering women away in these more progressive countries, it apparently starts early, way before they're even thinking about a career. The link in the paragraph above does show that boys get more encouragement in school teachers suggesting they could grow up to be engineers or whatever , and in fact, boys tend to be more confident in their ability to do science even when they're worse at it than the girls.
If so, we can surely agree that the goal is to A make sure every workplace is welcoming, regardless of gender and B make sure nobody is being made to feel weird about their choices, whether they want to be an engineer, housewife, soldier, or Instagram butt model.
That goes for everyone -- another study found that when women are mistreated at work insulted, berated, etc. This happens, according to the subjects, when they act assertive or dominant -- meaning that when they broke traditional gender norms, it was usually other women who punished them. Well, you'll be happy to know that the rate of school shootings has been dropping for decades , and today kids are about ten times more likely to be killed walking or bicycling to school than they are to be fatally shot. Actually, most people are not happy to hear it, but we'll talk about that.
Now, you may have recently seen a stat claiming there have been school shootings since Sandy Hook, but that's incredibly misleading. Half of those are accidents, nonfatal incidents, or suicides, mostly on college campuses -- which are a huge problem, but not what a single person imagines when they hear "school shooting.
The real public health hazard of firearms is suicide, but apparently everybody thinks that's boring. Anyway, I know why people hate seeing stats like this. They're afraid positive news will rob the gun control movement of urgency. But I never want to be relying on weaponized ignorance as a strategy, and there's something extremely important to note here: A single huge news event shouldn't be treated like a statistical trend. These shootings should be treated like terror attacks, because that's what they are.
And just as we shouldn't harass Muslims after every ISIS attack since that's precisely what ISIS wants , we shouldn't target socially isolated kids as potential mass shooters. Incidents of bullying at school have been dropping since , when the government started keeping track. That's another supposedly unsolvable, inevitable part of life that turned out to be neither of those things. It took me a solid five years to figure out that terrorists are manipulating this particular flaw in the way information is spread: Humans tend to mistake the spectacular for the common.
The target isn't the victims, it's the viewers at home. They know that due to a glitch in the human brain, seeing news stories about one terror attack equals terror attacks.
That's how a rare, statistical blip of an event can make million people afraid to leave the house. Mass shooters, like all terrorists, know this. It's just not convenient to commit crimes with a rifle; it's only the most dedicated who'll take the trouble. By the way, I don't care if you want to heavily regulate assault rifles or high-capacity magazines.
Make every gun owner pass six months of training and a Voight-Kampff Test. You're statistically more likely to be killed by someone's bare fists than by an assault rifle, and you're more than times more likely to die of any other cause than to be murdered by any method. Those numbers keep going down because what we've been doing the last couple of decades to fight these problems has been working.
Not that the average person realizes it. Experts can tell you that fear of crime isn't spread by crime -- it's spread by other people who are afraid of crime , even in low-crime communities. The whole reason mass killings occur in clusters is that we think the media attention triggers the next potential killer who's lying in wait. If they're living a power fantasy, their true power isn't in dealing death, it's in dealing fear.
What psychopath can resist the prospect of a whole culture cowering before them? You may say that the news should just stop covering those shootings, but that's again talking about using structured ignorance as a problem-solving strategy. What needs to change is how we choose to react to it.
So as I'm writing this, news broke that another young, unarmed black man was shot in his back yard , by officers who claim they mistook his cell phone for a gun. Click that link if you want to watch the body camera footage of the whole thing, from the cameras the officers knew were on when they pulled the trigger. Or you can check out this story of two cops beating the shit out of a black man for jaywalking , captured clearly on nine different body cam videos.
That brings us to the data none of us were hoping to hear: The largest study on the subject, done in Washington, D. Prior studies had shown mixed results -- in at least one case, fatal shootings actually went up. Like most data, it can be interpreted in any number of awful ways.
You can say that this proves the system is so corrupt that cops know they'll get off even with video, or that it proves cops always believed they were making the right decision in the moment, and that if anything, they were holding back before. You know what did reduce citizen complaints and result in fewer suspects being killed, according to one study?
Providing military gear to police. I don't want my police to have tanks, because I prefer not to live in a motherfucking dystopia. But this is the data we've got to work with, and we don't get to just hand-wave it away if we claim to believe in science. Oh, and while you're arguing among yourselves about this, go ahead and talk about that other huge study that found no link between poverty and violent crime.
That "Mistaking the spectacular for the common" mechanism that makes Americans in quiet towns fear being gunned down by a mass shooter or beheaded by MS is at play here, too. Racists want you to believe they're taking over, but all that's growing is a fringe of highly visible, spectacular racism. Nice algorithm you've got there, guys. I love seeing these in my recommendations:. But overall, racist attitudes continue their sharp decline , even in the Trump era. You're not seeing a turning of the tide in racism.
You're seeing increasing polarization, the losing side getting louder and crazier. This includes intentionally staging appearances they know will draw protests so that they can play victim. The fact that the rest of us find them repulsive is what generates the noise.
This means team leaders must also invest the time to understand the motivations of each person and help each one connect to the team's direction. Are you one of those team leaders who believes everyone should engage because you say they should? Do you expect people to fully engage because of the reasons you give them? If so, might I suggest you break that mold and start thinking differently?
Yes, knowing what you believe and why you believe it is a very powerful force, and a necessary ingredient for creating passion-driven teams. But people aren't going to give their all until they see their own reasons for doing so. As a team leader, it's your responsibility to help people find that connection. I recently worked with an organization that had a highly-confident senior manager telling everyone the right things to do and encouraging everyone to connect, but he was giving his own reasons for why they should be doing so.
Very few people were giving percent. Most were doing only enough to get by.
Thankfully, many junior managers got the message and started helping their team members see their own reasons to connect. Connect it all together Bottom line: If your beliefs are strong you have a powerful thing. The presence of a "can-do" attitude is a prerequisite for creating passion-driven teams. Team leaders must have it, and must instill it in each team member. But for team members to fully engage, team leaders must be crystal-clear about the vision for the team, and take the time to help each team member discover his or her own reasons for engaging with that vision.
This includes intentionally staging appearances they know will draw protests so that they can play victim. The Giants showed us they mean it a few weeks ago. You're seeing increasing polarization, the losing side getting louder and crazier. Make every gun owner pass six months of training and a Voight-Kampff Test. And my experience with him to this point tells me he still has a chance to play at a very high level.
If you say you "can't" or "won't" do this, you've already determined your outcome. Was Earth a giant snowball?? Here is an interesting article: This looks like it could be a great resource! People need real answers to these big questions! Ep 97 - Ancient Man was Very Intelligent!!: How often do you watch or read the source material that we post? I would encourage you to watch those Astronomy videos that I just linked above with an open mind.
BrendanFitton What is wrong with doing new research? That is why we do science, especially in areas that may challenge our preconceived ideas - that may lead to further new insights! If you have missed our previous episodes, look back at our older videos — put up each Wednesday and enjoy this series!