Compagnons (Littérature Française) (French Edition)
Contents:
Proust et ses peintres , C. Bertini, Mariolina, Direction de collectif et Compagnon, Antoine dir. Directions de collectif — , Proust et les moyens de la connaissance , Strasbourg, Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg, Vallier editors , Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy. Patey sous la direction de , Tra le lingue tra i linguaggi.
Guindani, Lo stereoscopio di Proust. Fotografia, pittura e fantasmagoria nella Recherche, Milano, Mimesis, Merleau-Ponty fra Husserl e Proust , in A. Risset sous la direction de , Scene del sogno, Roma, Artemide, , p.
Navigation menu
Merleau-Ponty between Husserl and Proust , in T. Mondo estetico, arte, pensiero , Milano, Guerini e Associati, Carriedo , Lourdes, Guerrero, Maria Luisa dir. Direction de collectifs —, Cent ans de jalousie proustienne , dir. Contini, Annamaria, Ouvrage Marcel Proust. Tempo, meafora, conoscenza , Bologne, clueb, Descombes, Vincent, Ouvrages Proust. Dubois, Jacques, Ouvrages Pour Albertine: Philosophie deleuzienne et roman proustien , HYX, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, Engel, Pascal, Ouvrage Va savoir!
The Goncourt Brothers and Marcel Proust. Garritano, Daniele, Ouvrage Il senso del segreto. A la recherche du temps perdu de M.
Proust et Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften de R. Grasso, Giuseppe, Ouvrage La scrittura come meditazione filosofica. Tre letture di Proust , Chieti, Solfanelli, Guindani, Sara, Ouvrage Lo stereoscopio di Proust. Rogers eds, Paris, Champion, Poetica, retorica e filologia della memoria.
Paris, Champion, , p. Henry, Anne, Ouvrage Marcel Proust.
See a Problem?
Jousset, Philippe, Ouvrage En proie aux mots. Ouvrage —, Images, passages: Kristeva, Julia, Ouvrage Le Temps sensible. Ladenson, Elisabeth, Ouvrage Proust lesbien , trad.
Landy, Joshua, Ouvrage Philosophy as Fiction. Direction de collectif —, et C.
Bibliographie
Bewegendes und bewegtes , Fink, Gattungsgrenzen und Epochenschwelle , Fink, Directions de collectifs —, et Chardin, Philippe dir. Direction de collectif —, voir Felten, Uta. Its content spans two major fields, oratory and poetry, with oratory taking the place of honor. It may be said in general that this class is concerned mainly with the art of rhetoric, the refinement of style, and erudition.
Aubert, Nathalie, Ouvrage Proust. Proust et ses peintres , C. Your list has reached the maximum number of items. Palgrave MacMillan, , pp. Specialization of labor is a capitalist invention that had already been identified by Marx as contributing to the mechanization of workers, hence their alienation from the act of production. Linked Data More info about Linked Data.
Erudition is to be sought in the study of historical events, ethnology, the authoritative views of scholars, and wide sources of knowledge, but rather sparingly according to the capacity of the pupils. It should not be allowed to distract attention from concentrated study of the language. For the first time, the idea of viewing literary study no longer as a marker of social distinction, but rather as one of the foundations of general education, was taken seriously at the highest levels. Comment fonder cet enseignement. In addition to the reforms, symbolic changes to the institutional setting of literary studies had recently exacerbated the conflict, including: These events were considered part of an intentional decline in quality to allow for greater access to higher education an interpretation comparable, in the USA, to defensive reactions to the revolution in higher education sparked by the GI Bill.
The ensuing reaction has a familiar ring to anyone involved with education over the last fifty years: For the advocates of literary history, it was a question of bringing scientific rigor to literary studies so as to grant the discipline a place in the new scientific university in the nationalization of French higher education in parallel developments occurred in the United States, such as the founding of the University of Chicago in —this was indeed an international phenomenon.
Compagnon is careful to point out, however, that the debate over literary studies in the years before and after is more complex than it appears. For Lanson, literary history was a means of grounding and justifying literary analysis, not of replacing it with something else. Work was sacred before it was defiled by owners and speculators who stripped it of its moral dimension.
Instead of history finding its inspiration in literature, which was a manner of redeeming itself, in the above-mentioned tradition extending from Michelet to Fustel de Coulanges, it now saw itself as scientific, in other words as materialistic: Specialization of labor is a capitalist invention that had already been identified by Marx as contributing to the mechanization of workers, hence their alienation from the act of production.
Massis and Tarde were not Marxists, however, and thus were not able to develop this argument directly.
They claimed that according to the new discipline of sociology, people are defined by their function within the larger collective: Similarly, students of literature, who once were craftsmen or even artists in their own right, have become assembly-line workers. The logical goal of Taylorism, after all, is a totally unskilled and therefore cheap and plentiful workforce, with engineering on a large scale replacing individual craftsmanship and design.
The artisan, who has much in common with the artist and literary critic , is being replaced by the line worker, who has nothing in common with either. The economic metaphor continues its course. The authors concede that the new methods are within the reach of the abilities of a greater number of people.
Journal of French Literary History - Literature and Linguistics - Journals - Classiques Garnier
How could they not be, since the ultimate goal of the assembly line is to rationalize labor, dividing it into so many individual parts that no skill is required? Economically, this makes sense, according to Massis and Tarde, except for one thing: If the captains of industry, for whom the benefits of Taylorism are quite obvious, deplore the changes in education, then that is conclusive evidence that literary studies must be protected from the modernization that increasingly pervades society.
But the use of Birmingham, and then the United States, as illustration of this argument suggests something quite different: The familiar specter of French anti-Americanism rears its head in a debate that, on the surface, does not seem to involve America at all; fear of cultural decline inevitably seems linked to fear of American modernity.
- s’inscrire à l’espace pro.
- Navigation.
- Lettres et sciences humaines.