Strange things begin to happen when a group of friends gather for a dinner party on an evening when a comet is passing overhead. Eight candidates for a highly desirable corporate job are locked together in an exam room and given a final test with just one question. It seems simple yet confusing that soon, tensions begin to unravel.
A group of friends suffer a yachting accident and take refuge on a cruise drifting on the open sea, but quickly realize they were better off on the upturned yacht. In , when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent into the past, where a hired gun awaits - someone like Joe - who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by sending back Joe's future self for assassination. A soldier fighting aliens gets to relive the same day over and over again, the day restarting every time he dies.
With the help of a mysterious pill that enables the user to access one hundred percent of his brain abilities, a struggling writer becomes a financial wizard, but it also puts him in a new world with lots of dangers. An impromptu goodbye party for Professor John Oldman becomes a mysterious interrogation after the retiring scholar reveals to his colleagues he has a longer and stranger past than they can imagine. Stranded at a desolate Nevada motel during a nasty rain-storm, ten strangers become acquainted with each other when they realize that they're being killed off one by one.
Now, on his final assignment, the Agent must pursue the one criminal that has eluded him throughout time. Start your free trial. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet! Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew.
For his final assignment, a top temporal agent must pursue the one criminal that has eluded him throughout time. The chase turns into a unique, surprising and mind-bending exploration of love, fate, identity and time travel taboos. Wait, Is Mary Poppins a Witch? Share this Rating Title: Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Predestination has been especially associated with John Calvin and the Reformed tradition. There has been no argument in Reformed theology about the positive side of the doctrine of predestination concerning the election of those whom God wills to save.
Difference of opinion, however, arose over whether God determines who is reprobated. Bullinger did not believe that….
Christian doctrines of predestination may be considered explanations of the words of the Apostle Paul ,. For those whom he [God] foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the first-born among many brethren. And those whom he predestined he also called; and those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified Rom.
Three types of predestination doctrine, with many variations, have developed.
One notion associated with Semi-Pelagianism , some forms of nominalism, and Arminianism makes foreknowledge the ground of predestination and teaches that God predestined to salvation those whose future faith and merits he foreknew. At the opposite extreme is the notion of double predestination , commonly identified with John Calvin and especially associated with the Synod of Dort and appearing also in some of the writings of St. Augustine and Martin Luther and in the thought of the Jansenists. According to this notion, God has determined from eternity whom he will save and whom he will damn, regardless of their faith, love, or merit, or lack thereof.
A third notion was set forth in other writings of St. Augustine and Luther , in the decrees of the second Council of Orange , and in the thought of St. We welcome suggested improvements to any of our articles. You can make it easier for us to review and, hopefully, publish your contribution by keeping a few points in mind. In spite of the division, many Calvinist theologians would consider the debate surrounding the infra- and supralapsarian positions one in which scant Scriptural evidence can be mustered in either direction, and that, at any rate, has little effect on the overall doctrine.
Some Calvinists decline to describe the eternal decree of God in terms of a sequence of events or thoughts, and many caution against the simplifications involved in describing any action of God in speculative terms. Most make distinctions between the positive manner in which God chooses some to be recipients of grace, and the manner in which grace is consciously withheld so that some are destined for everlasting punishments.
Debate concerning predestination according to the common usage concerns the destiny of the damned: Arminians hold that God does not predetermine, but instead infallibly knows who will believe and perseveringly be saved. This view is known as conditional election , because it states that election is conditional on the one who wills to have faith in God for salvation.
Although God knows from the beginning of the world who will go where, the choice is still with the individual.
The Dutch Calvinist theologian Franciscus Gomarus strongly opposed the views of Jacobus Arminius with his doctrine of supralapsarian predestination. Foreordination, an important doctrine of the LDS Church, [45] [46] teaches that during the pre-mortal existence , God selected "foreordained" particular people to fulfill certain missions "callings" during their mortal lives. For example, prophets were foreordained to be the Lord's servants see Jeremiah 1: The LDS Church teaches the doctrine of moral agency , the ability to choose and act for oneself, and decide whether to accept Christ's atonement.
Conditional election is the belief that God chooses for eternal salvation those whom he foresees will have faith in Christ. This belief emphasizes the importance of a person's free will. The counter-view is known as unconditional election , and is the belief that God chooses whomever he will, based solely on his purposes and apart from an individual's free will. It has long been an issue in Calvinist—Arminian debate. An alternative viewpoint is Corporate election , which distinguishes God's election and predestination for corporate entities such as the community "in Christ," and individuals who can benefit from that community's election and predestination so long as they continue belonging to that community.
Infralapsarianism also called sublapsarianism holds that predestination logically coincides with the preordination of Man's fall into sin. That is, God predestined sinful men for salvation. Therefore, according to this view, God is the ultimate cause , but not the proximate source or "author" of sin. Infralapsarians often emphasize a difference between God's decree which is inviolable and inscrutable , and his revealed will against which man is disobedient.
Proponents also typically emphasize the grace and mercy of God toward all men, although teaching also that only some are predestined for salvation. In common English parlance, the doctrine of predestination often has particular reference to the doctrines of Calvinism. The version of predestination espoused by John Calvin , after whom Calvinism is named, is sometimes referred to as "double predestination" because in it God predestines some people for salvation i.
Reprobation which results by allowing the individual's own sins to condemn them. Calvin himself defines predestination as "the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. Not all are created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestined to life or to death.
On the spectrum of beliefs concerning predestination, Calvinism is the strongest form among Christians. It teaches that God's predestining decision is based on the knowledge of his own will rather than foreknowledge, concerning every particular person and event; and, God continually acts with entire freedom, in order to bring about his will in completeness, but in such a way that the freedom of the creature is not violated, "but rather, established".
Calvinists who hold the infralapsarian view of predestination usually prefer that term to "sublapsarianism," perhaps with the intent of blocking the inference that they believe predestination is on the basis of foreknowledge sublapsarian meaning, assuming the fall into sin. Supralapsarianism is the doctrine that God's decree of predestination for salvation and reprobation logically precedes his preordination of the human race's fall into sin.
That is, God decided to save, and to damn; he then determined the means by which that would be made possible. It is a matter of controversy whether or not Calvin himself held this view, but most scholars link him with the infralapsarian position. It is known, however, that Calvin's successor in Geneva, Theodore Beza , held to the supralapsarian view. Double predestination, or the double decree, is the doctrine that God actively reprobates , or decrees damnation of some, as well as salvation for those whom he has elected.
Augustine made statements that on their own seem to teach such a doctrine, but in the context of his other writings it is not clear whether he held it. Augustine's doctrine of predestination does seem to imply a double predestinarian view. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death.
Open theism advocates the non-traditional Arminian view of election that predestination is corporate. Or put differently, God chooses what type of individuals he will save. In other words, God chose from all eternity to save all those who would be found in Christ, by faith in God. This choosing is not primarily about salvation from eternal destruction either but is about God's chosen agency in the world. Thus individuals have full freedom in terms of whether they become members of the church or not. Corporate election is thus consistent with the open view's position on God's omniscience, which states that God's foreknowledge does not determine the outcomes of individual free will.
Middle Knowledge is a concept that was developed by Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina , and exists under a doctrine called Molinism. It attempts to deal with the topic of predestination by reconciling Gods sovereign providence with the notion of libertarian free will. The concept of Middle Knowledge holds that God has a knowledge of true pre-volitional counterfactuals for all free creatures. That is, what any individual creature with a free will e. Gods knowledge of counterfactuals is reasoned to occur logically prior to his divine creative decree that is, prior to creation , and after his knowledge of necessary truths.
Thus, Middle Knowledge holds that before the world was created, God knew what every existing creature capable of libertarian freedom e. It then holds that based on this information, God elected from a number of these possible worlds , the world most consistent with his ultimate will, which is the actual world that we live in.
Predestination () Ethan Hawke at an event for Predestination () Michael Spierig and Peter Spierig at an event for Predestination () Sarah Snook. Predestination is a Australian science fiction thriller film written and directed by Michael and Peter Spierig. The film stars Ethan Hawke, Sarah Snook, and.
Based on this Middle Knowledge, God has the ability to actualise the world in which A is placed in a circumstance that he freely chooses to do what is consistent with Gods ultimate will. If God determined that the world most suited to his purposes is a world in which A would freely choose Y instead of Z, God can actualise a world in which Free Creature A finds himself in Circumstance B. In this way, Middle Knowledge is thought of by its proponents to be consistent with any theological doctrines that assert God as having divine providence and man having a libertarian freedom e.
Calvinism, Catholicism, Lutheranism , and to offer a potential solution to the concerns that Gods providence somehow nullifies man from having true liberty in his choices. In Islam, "predestination" is the usual English language rendering of a belief that Muslims call al-qada wa al-qadar in Arabic.
The phrase means "the divine decree and the predestination". In Islam, God has predetermined, known, ordained, and is constantly creating every event that takes place in the world. This is entailed by his being omnipotent and omniscient. Sunni scholars hold that there is no contradiction in people's deeds and naturally their choices being created and predetermined by the creator, since they define free will to be the antonym of compulsion and coercion.
People — in the Sunni perspective — do acknowledge that they are free, since they do not see anybody or anything forcing them to do whatever they chose to do.
This, however, does not contradict that everything they do, including the choices they make, are predestined and predetermined by God. Consequently, people are already predestined to either heaven or hell at birth, as Sunnis believe; however, they will have no argument on the day of judgment since they never knew in advance what their fate would be, and they do acknowledge that they have choice; which is what moral responsibility comes with. The concept of human will being predetermined by God's will is stated clearly in the Quran: Predestination is rejected in Shiaism.
In Rabbinic literature , there is much discussion as to the apparent contradiction between God's omniscience and free will. The representative view is that "Everything is foreseen; yet free will is given" Rabbi Akiva , Pirkei Avoth 3: Based on this understanding, the problem is formally described as a paradox , perhaps beyond our understanding. Hasdai Crescas resolved this dialectical tension by taking the position that free will doesn't exist.
All of a person's actions are predetermined by the moment of their birth, and thus their judgment in the eyes of God so to speak is effectively preordained. In this scheme this is not a result of God's predetermining one's fate, but rather that the universe is deterministic. Crescas's views on this topic were rejected by Judaism at large. In later centuries this idea independently developed among some in the Chabad Lubavitch movement of Hasidic Judaism.
Many individuals within Chabad take this view seriously, and hence effectively deny the existence of free will. However, many Chabad Lubavitch Jews attempt to hold both views. They affirm as infallible their rebbe 's teachings that God knows and controls the fate of all, yet at the same time affirm the classical Jewish belief in free will.