Les Histoires de Macathy: Robin et la bombe  (- SDE) (French Edition)

---

A house in London had a blue plaque as far back as It's irritating to find barefaced lies repeated in so-called English Heritage. I looked at July 's issue; even with padding the magazine gets ever-thinner. It has 6 pages on films partly show in 'historic sites', including Victoria and Abdul, Wonder Woman, Avengers: And 4 pages on another film, Dunkirk , more trash. There's a page on 'Shakespeare's Birthplace'. It's all very sad.

But the long-established English tradition, if it can be called that, telling lies about so-called 'Jews', is maintained. In the past, there were more of such people per thousand. During mediaeval times, for example, one imagines an artist with his atelier, and underlings grinding pigments, stretching canvases, and painting boring background bits. Televisually interesting subjects are possibly rather rare: The industrialised world's food has changed to what seems a fantastic extent, though of course the nutritional basis is more or less the same.

Consider the attractive stone octagonal kitchen at Glastonbury Abbey, with a fireplace in four corners. Probably this mostly cooked meat and bread potatoes hadn't been discovered; nor had maize. Herbs and spices, and sugar, and edible oil, usually come from plants in hot climates, because they have spare energy to make by-products. There were onions, but not tomatoes. A modern time-traveller might have been reminded of Ray Kroc's establishment, 'MacDonalds'.

By , root vegetables supported cattle over winter; potatoes supported people throughout the year; ships and railways routinely carried food; refrigeration had been invented; vacuum-sealed canisters, airtight tins and jars were mass-produced; electric cooking was added to gas cooking. Peasants, in Britain, growing and preserving and cooking their own food, were as obsolete as hand-loom weavers. The stage was set for professionalisation of cookery, though not really in Britain—warmer climates were better adapted to food designed to be attractive, France being a prominent example, with several hundred local types of cheese, and several hundred types of wine.

To this day Michelin—a guidebook started in by a tyre company—awards stars which rule part of the emotional lives of chefs, with 3 stars the maximum, which seems appropriate for Ramsay's book. H G Wells wrote a short story A Misunderstood Artist , possibly suggested by Escoffier at the Savoy, with hints of playful experimentation. Passing over rural inns, urban chop houses, the Lyons Corner House phenomenon and the Aerated Bread Company, fish and chips , proprietary relishes 'Gentleman's Relish' for example and pastes and chocolate bars, Evelyn Waugh promoting foreign food, and a few dozen wars, we arrive at , Ramsay's year of birth.

There's a lot of 'human interest' here, including his father, who appears to have been a derivative pop impersonator—a product of TV and electronic media, someone who never saw the original performer. And a brother who became a drug addict, though I don't think the supplier chain is identified.

A word to people in similar circumstances: They make up 'news' anyway. I won't bother with these details, or Ramsay's ambition to take up football—one of the secrets of football is that many footballers become crippled. It's a bit disappointing to find Ramsay regards a council house upbringing as an embarrassment, as, it seems, did Pierre Marco White, under whom he worked for a time. I wonder if earlier British socialists would have been annoyed. Chefs, judging by Ramsay, don't seem to have a high opinion of each other, except when, like actors, they have a motive for luvviness.

Quite a few conflicts are listed, and some omissions: Ramsay owned 3, cookbooks not the British 'cookery books'. His favourite is Nigel Slater. One might have thought the leading chefs could have a reunion every year or two, for example, and exchange anecdotes about the poor quality and unreasonableness of their diners. Maybe their wives could cook, to reduce competitive problems Ramsay says interesting things en passant about the employees and lower orders who must numerically dominate the fine eating industry.

For example he worked on Reg Grundy's private yacht in the British Virgin Islands, and recounts how some of the staff got the idea it was their yacht, and behaved inappropriately, rather in the way I gather that roadies with pop groups behave. Ramsay says, convincingly, that most of his staff stayed with him, though he sacked some who presumably couldn't take the pace or the required skill-levels.

Ramsay is remarkably low on technical details of cooking: And surely there must be valuable rules of thumb, or physics laws, to help cook? Watching some Hell's Kitchens would-be chefs not even able to cook risotto "riz-odo" in American suggests there's a need for helpful mnemonics. Surely there must be facts on transmission of heat, temperatures to get proteins cooked, measures of chewability of foods, effects of marinades, the ageing of wines, the effects of microwaves, the mixing of flavours?

What does Sous Vide cooking in clear plastic do? Is liquid nitrogen useful? Can rum be injected by hypodermic into mince pies? Is papaya the best enzyme for softening meat? Another apparent omission—I may be wrong here—is the economics of the top of the restaurant market. Ramsay's writings feel a bit like flowers, evolved to exude nectar, and expecting to be rewarded with the arrival of bees. Ramsay the feeling about New York that it's terrifically rich, but surely there must be some uncertainty—Jew-promoted non-whites everywhere, for example.

I can remember being shocked at the small number of Americans who bought hardback books. Yet another omission is detail on the use of illegals in restaurants, sandwich-making places, etc. For example, I noticed an article about 'Sanctuary Restaurants' after Trump's election ; and, twenty years ago, a sandwich seller cheerfully admitting most of his workers were illegal 'immigrants'. I wonder if part of the intention behind TV chef programmes is to scrub up the image of restaurants.

The final chapter, inserted into the edition, reads like Ingvar Kamprad 's biography: Looking back, I can't really tell how successful he was. Gordon Ramsay Holdings, an Internet search or two reveals, had liabilities in mid listed as 36 million sterling, though I'd guess his TV appearance fees may be held in a different account.

He adds a description of a Christmas visit to Helmand in Afghanistan 'in conjunction with the Ministry of Defence and the Daily Mirror'. He describes year old soldiers as 'ready, focused, and just incredibly disciplined', with 'Christmas treat donated by Philip Green of Top Shop and BHS fame'. Philip Green attained subsequent fame as something like a Jewish pension-fund thief from what was British Home Stores.

He says 'Trust me, there were no special arrangements. Out there, it doesn't matter a fuck who you are'—as though Jew financiers and their political puppets are there all the time. Clearly, revisionist thinking is not a part of his mental equipment. He thinks National Service should be re-introduced. On his return, in aged 40, he was part of a star-studded party 'in the Banqueting House, Whitehall'. One of Gordon Ramsay's achievements along with Ozzy Osbourne must be included weakening of the image of the British as shy, retiring, and polite.

I could find nothing on 'Kosher' food, or the Kosher scam imposed on Americans and others. Probably the US critics would prefer to redirect diners to something like Solly's maximum torture K salt beef n bagels shack. Anyway, his New York restaurant has closed. It occurred to me that possibly Ramsay thinks he's a 'Jew'; Ramsay is listed as a Jewish surname.

At the time he wrote, he'd been contracted to do the British TV Hell's Kitchen , 'one of the worst experiences of my life'. The US version, in a converted LA warehouse, started in about , and is still going. The difference was they had applicants who were not well-known, and with some cooking experience, and who wanted to run their own places.

Kitchen Nightmares postdates this book, and shows that there can be such a thing as bad publicity. A majority closed, not in my view surprisingly. There's a significant point here, relevant to the present-day Jewish censorship: Ramsay's handlers are careful never to let this show, just as there is no reference to 'Kosher' practices.

And this applies to this book. OK to insult other chefs; taboo to tell truths Jews think are bad publicity. Gordon Ramsay doesn't speculate much on public perception of these restaurants: It might be fun to watch other people in a restaurant being served food contrary to expectations: This was before television; and before radio and cinema. Before colour photographs, refrigeration, telephones.

Before commercial electric light; gas lights were at that time leading-edge recent inventions. No motor-cars; London had many horse-drawn cabs, and of course horses needed such things as livery stables and horse tack and food and shoes—and disposal facilities. Flying machines were widely believed to be an impossibility. Jacobs, and Jack London, were a vast global haulage industry. A threat to British sea power was 'unthinkable'.

Cheap paper was being engineered; of the results, 'Tit-Bits' existed, with 'Comic Cuts' soon about to come. It would be more than 60 years before the habit of 'watching' television, for four or five hours an evening, dulled the wits of masses of people. The railways were then the fastest-ever inland travel system.

They led to railway inns near stations, access even to small villages, the growth of seaside resorts, J. Smith's railway station bookstalls.

And to worries about where the hell am I: J's Waterloo station has a joke bribe to an engine driver for reassurance. Or so the publisher thought: But J says nothing about high status people: Or company promoters for African mines. But there's nothing at all. Jerome left school at 14 and no doubt was overawed. Three Men in a Boat was written when he was twice that age.

Operettas are a close equivalent to Three Men in a Boat: Three Men in a Boat dodges much of the technical problem of precise description by personifying nature: Here's a longer, impressive, extract from such a passage: The three men are J himself, George the bank clerk, Harris, and a noisy fox terrier named Montmorency. I've just read that Keith Richards calls his dog 'syphilis'—Five men and a disease?

J's main narrative device is speech: His internalised speech mostly recounts irritations between the men as they wrestle emotionally with each other and with an indifferent universe. All these digressions are suited to reading aloud: I'm surprised how little description J puts into his book. The dog, and Harris's blazer, are described in greater detail than any of the three men. Harris's twelve stone is regarded as 'big'; this may be a comment on the unindustrialised diet of the times.

Possibly the paucity of description is related to J's early educational terminus: There's quite a contrast with say Jack London's highly-detailed accounts of physiologies and physiognomies. The clue may be in Idle Thoughts of an Idle Fellow , published a few years earlier, which contains many similar situations to Three Men in a Boat , but all expressed in the form of autobiographical meditational monologues. Wrapping these thoughts but not those on poverty and pawn-shops with bodily forms undeniably expands into a more appealing package.

Jerome, confident that emotions are similar between types of people, liked colloquial speech: Here's an example of a whole cluster of short popular phrases: Not, I explained, upon my own account. I was never queer. But I was afraid for George. George said he should be all right, and would rather like it, but he would advise Harris and me not to think of it, as he felt sure we should both be ill.

Harris said that, to himself, it was always a mystery how people managed to get sick at sea Perhaps these things are intrinsically one-off and isolated, like the song A Whiter Shade of Pale. Could this be autobiographical? The author of the world's best ever autobiography could not, one imagines, ever write another one. I scribbled down some English novels: Day's History of Sandford and Merton ish ; Valentine Vox Cockton, ish ; Mrs Caudle's Curtain Lectures Jerrold, ish ; Tom Brown's Schooldays ; Erewhon Butler; ; Diary of a Nobody Grossmiths, ; maybe Zuleika Dobson Beerbohm, and other later works, but didn't find compelling lessons apart from avoiding unpleasant topics, and allowing titillating but not dangerous exploits.

Let me return to Britain, and the then-current events—which may well have led many readers to seek escapism. Here are a few items: Underground trains in London after an earlier start expanded c. In were the 'Whitechapel Murders'—foreshadowing today, where murders of whites are ignored by the media.

There's nothing of this in Jerome, though there is a drowned single mother story. The 'Aliens Act' was The Thames note for Americans: Westminster and Hyde Park, the City of London and London Bridge, and east to Whitechapel, Stepney, Rotherhithe docks, Deptford, Greenwich, Woolwich and further to the sea—flanked by many rural-sounding placenames—are redolent of the tougher businesslike history of Britain. From its source, the river, called the Isis, is much narrower, and very winding: Britain was one of the first industrialised countries, but Jerome, writing his book in a Victorian summer, overlooking London, preferred to write of rural scenes and situations.

I'd guess he used maps and guidebooks to fill out the detail. Jerome opens his book with a long passage of rather absurd exaggeration about more-or-less imaginary illnesses one is 'general disinclination to work' of the three men. These turn into the motive for their river jaunt. If you like that scene-setting, you'll probably like the rest of the book. At the finale, exeunt the three, muddy and dishevelled after several days of rain, going to the Alhambra, Leicester Square—mistaken for the 'contortionists from the Himalaya Mountains'.

The pace is slow: Windsor, Runnymede, Magna Carta island, Maidenhead and Marlow, are some of the places visited or rowed past. Jerome omitted Eton, true to form, though his route must have passed close. Much of the scenery is still identifiable: Chapter 11 includes a memorable three-age-or-so section 'specially inserted for schools' on Magna Charta his spelling and 'the cup of liberty', at an island at Runnymede in John we are told died a year later, having ravaged England, and then absolved by Pope Innocent.

Jerome sounds something like Walter Scott; I don't know the sources he must have pored over, but a charter of liberties sounds good, and the deeper realities, such as Edward I's expulsion of Jews 75 years later, and Norman barons and resentful Saxons, are not part of Jerome's purpose; any more than they are now, in semi-official guidebooks and Pitkin glossy colour brochures. A few other historical events appear in Jerome, reflecting published views of the time: Caesar and Cassivelaunus, approved for the operational students of the past who were not to know Belloc's secret they never suspected; Henry VIII having an energetic time courting Anne; and 'the Parliamentary struggle' as presented by the news sources of the time.

Dark and fearsome countryside provides frissons of terror: Allied to this are country churchyards with memorials one including a few skulls , like. But of course, as the Med provides the continuo for Ulysses, or steam trains the background for Close Encounter , the Thames naturally permeates the story, though mostly as background for amusing human activity.

Jerome deploys just a few technical terms: J has an eye for status: Towing has several vignettes: And we have the hazards of drinking river water, and washing in it; the characters of lock keepers; angry swans; girls' clothes getting splashed by a hearty rowing man; and washerwomen before the days of electric washing machines.

Les Histoires de Macathy: Robin et la bombe (- SDE) (French Edition)

Jerome even pleas for the simple life but with cautions against sea trips and early morning dips with a rowing-boat fable admittedly, he followed it with an apology: This is a world of small boys on street corners; small boys running errands—proof that telephones were not needed. And of houses and landladies; no doubt responsible to shadowy landowners.

Jerome's technique, which works well enough with opening tinned pineapple, packing for a journey, ruminating over barometers and weather forecasts, trying to sleep, penetrating smells, trying to cook stew, doing what's now called DIY, avoids some issues: His account of writing his own material might have been worth reading. And there must be something to learn from the sets of objects J avoids, for example the upper classes, complicated and tiresome negotiations, and negotiations generally—he omits amusing accounts of shopping, for instance, and horse-trading.

He has nothing on pagan aspects of the world, though he knows about the Sandwich Islands: He has nothing on improving lectures for the lower orders. Jerome did not attempt the piano as a comic subject. Beefsteak pie, gooseberry tarts, leg of mutton, bacon, eggs, bread, butter, jam. Canned pineapple; I'd guess cans were expensive and for luxuries. Fast food was chop houses: Only one of them knew what 'scrambled eggs' were. We also have 'bitter beer' which I suspect kept well, in days before refrigeration. And we have long clay pipes, made of kaolin, before cigarettes: Anyway; more jokes, anecdotes, narratives, unions against others as in 'Jews' laughing at 'goyim'.

And what might be called 'craic'. Now, the shrewd reader will know that Jerome was not exactly a one hit wonder: Three Men on the Bummel is mostly set in Germany; for some reason—Brummagem? A 'bummel' is an electric tramcar, for example in Dresden. Some of these have long ago vanished in Britain: Bacup was one of the first British places to have them, something you'd never guess, now.

Jerome seems to have been co-opted into the anti-German lead-in to the 'Great War'; the last chapter of Three Men on the Bummel seem to have been inserted as part of this process. I'll just note a few things here.

Note on sightseers and historians: Gibbon had to trust to travellers' tales for a description of the Hellespont, and the Rhine was chiefly familiar to English students through.. Dr Johnson, familiar with little else than the view down Fleet Street, could read the description of a Yorkshire moor with pleasure and profit. To a cockney etc. But we, or rather the steam-engine and the camera for us, have changed all that.

Remember Germany was only recently unified. The disadvantage is that outside Hanover, which is only a small province, nobody understands this best German. Germany being separated so many centuries unto a dozen principalities, is unfortunate in possessing a variety of dialects. Germans from Posen wishful to converse with men of Wurtemburg, have to talk as often as not in French or English; and young ladies who have received an expensive education in Westphalia..

An English-speaking foreigner, it is true, would find himself equally nonplussed among the Yorkshire wolds, or the purlieus of Whitechapel; but.. Throughout Germany it is not only in the country districts and among the uneducated that dialects are maintained. Every province has practically its own language.. The explanation is that, in nine cases out of ten, he has learnt French from "Ahn's First-Course. Pilsener beer and Apollinaris water. Then Jerome on officials: With other evidence I'd suggest Jerome was part of the post anti-German drumbeat in Britain, added to the century-or-so old anti-Russian rumblings.

Later, his play, The Passing of the Third Floor Back , a lodging-house story, was turned into a depressing and moody black-and-white s film watchable on Internet. He may have ended his life as yet another fairly wealthy man with little in his head. How true this is, I have not attempted to discover.

It is not science! Apparently written by a simple insect man. I'd assumed this is a serious scientific work; such is the poor quality of modern reviewing. In fact it's painfully weak; in the process of reading it, I realised it's simply another part of the Jewish imposition of their ridiculous worldview. Let me start with an overview: Whatever that is; a statement somewhere says he was 'curator of entomology'. The book 'won' a Pulitzer Prize, a sort of guarantee of kosherness; royalties presumably to Harvard.

Part of the short cover blurb is 'hope must derive from a new scientific understanding of what it means to be human'. And it says, with splendid ignorance of the power of language and media, 'altruism, morality, religion, even love—are merely the survival strategies of our "selfish" genes To situate this book in time and place, remember E.

Eisenhower thought he was a Jew; I haven't checked on Truman, but he certainly was a Jewish pawn. They assisted Stalin in the post continuing attacks on Germany, for resisting Jews, and the post support for Jews in the USSR, which was achieved in my opinion by the Jewish-controlled pretence of 'nuclear weapons' and 'Cold War'. Kennedy seems to have been less of a Jewish pawn; unfortunately was murdered in , when E O Wilson was aged early 30s, and Johnson slipped into place.

The Jewish era consolidated with L B Johnson The link surveys Jewish interests at the time: The 'Holocaust' fraud gained momentum; Johnson a full Jew on both sides, I'm told supported Israel with the attack on the 'Liberty'. It was necessary for U. There was considerable unrest, managed usually by Jews, about US genocide in Vietnam: Anyway, Nixon , Ford , and then Carter President buried the issue rather than face it. Jewish liars planned out a new scheme of future fakes , mostly based on simple lies, in the Jewish manner: Thus for example 'universal human rights'—'more refined human rights in the European-American sense'—are given a 'primary value'.

Wilson is probably too stupid to see the ludicrous irony in this absurdity. Another exquisite irony is the avoidance of discussion of eugenics , even though he presumably knows natural selection is slow, cruel and tedious, and doesn't work with a technological society. Darwinism is one of the most important generalisations about life ever made, and could not be suppressed entirely.

There must have been casting about for Jew-friendly versions, designed to carry Jewish memes. Even such a shrewd observer as Kevin MacDonald said there was an attack by Jews on Darwinism and Sociobiology, bracketing the two together as though they were similar. Sociobiology was largely based on the 'kinship' idea of sharing genes, despite its weaknesses, suggested I think by J B S Haldane in the s, but usually attributed to William D Hamilton in The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology by Marshall Sahlins was early opposition, looking at real-life people, though not I think developed civilisations.

Dawkins' The Selfish Gene of was equally irrelevant to human beings. Dawkins wrote a chapter Sociobiology: It's interesting to note the censorship of evil obtains in many 'disciplines': I recall Atkins, of chemistry textbooks, getting excited over the fraud of the 'Holocaust', the simple old fool indifferent to millions burnt alive, killed by high explosives, suffering from birth defects, thanks to chemical engineers.

Two ideas flicker and surface throughout the book: T he other is evolution, which Wilson also doesn't grasp anything like fully. This may seem an odd claim to make; but here are four examples. Insects have an elaborate lifecycle, with eggs, larvae, pupae, and the 'perfect insect'.

How can this have evolved, and how did many insects become social? In Altruism, discussing social insects. But of course it's not 'broadened' at all. He's aware the contributions presumably become vanishingly small, but nevertheless has no way to fix a point where one odd ancestor's influence terminates. He has no genetic rationale for the existence of sex, i.

Ideas are one thing; the way they are presented is another. Wilson's writing style needs to be outlined here. It's reminiscent of many writers on evolution who are religious, or evasive: Dobzhansky if I remember correctly Wilson's style also reminds me of Marshall McLuhan's, with strings of short dubious assertions, mixed with longer, vague, but equally dubious assertions.

Many of the assertions are endnoted; the sources are mostly heavily-promoted, but not particularly good, books, often with then-current memes, such as the 'deep structure of religious belief' with a Chomskyesque feel, Dawkins' selfish gene, even the 'uncertainty principle'. So the result has a pub quiz quotation feeling: Of course it is!

Ernest Jones and Erich Fromm are quoted, but not their chieftain Freud, possibly to avoid accusations of pseudo-scientific contagion which had started to surface about Freud. Wilson's use of words has to be examined; how did he get away with this stuff? I have two theories here: If something isn't understood, people may be impressed if you coin a new word; 'sociology', when new, illustrates the point.

In Wilson's final chapter, on 'Hope', he looks forward to neurobiology, ethology, and sociobiology helping out; even if among other things the brain isn't understood. One of his conclusions is 'The principal task of human biology is to identify and to measure the constraints that influence the decisions of ethical philosophers and to everyone else, and to infer their significance through neurophysiological and phylogenetic reconstructions of the mind.

Where actual content is needed, poor Wilson has no idea. Mankind, or parts of it, has lived in changed conditions for—well, how long? There have perhaps been agricultural ages, stone ages, bronze and iron ages; is there a helpful name for what's been happening?

My second comment on Wilson's word structures is his use of fake continuisms. To illustrate, consider e. The subject changes being elided away. In Wilson's case, 'We' were all Africans —it said so in Time magazine. Then 'We' survived the Arctic ice-cap. Maybe; or, of course, maybe not, since slavery, caste, child labour, and conquered territories are with us still. This of course is in keeping with the Jewish worldview: Many goyim were shelled, burnt to death, shot, and so on, but Wilson states '..

At a lighter level, let's look at some of his chapters. On Sex , he says 'the processes of sexual pairbonding vary greatly He appears to know nothing of for example women used as sex objects, for example in 'modern' Israel. As I've pointed out, he has no idea that sex, despite the emotional feeling, is a mechanism for two sets of genes to come into play: He also copies other authors on crypsis in women, as opposed to many creatures, who have mating seasons.

He doesn't seem to recognise other infinitely important forms of crypsis: I'll say more of these below. On Religion , his opening sentence is a typical unsubstantiated assertion: He has routine material on monotheism; he seems unaware of things like 'Muti'.. He gives a 'Mother' Teresa joke: Of course she does! On Aggression , a popular topic at the time—I'd guess related to the US invasion and war crimes in Vietnam. I can only imagine he wanted to distance himself from Jewish 'Holocaust' claims. His Glossary gives his definition of aggression: I wonder if shouting at someone is considered 'aggression'.

Wilson has a shotgun attitude to endnotes and sources: Lists of names are dropped: One of the omissions characteristic of propagandists is an absence of feeling for possibilities and likelihoods, and I attribute these omissions to lack of genuine interest in the topics. Why would a propagandist bother with more than a few facts? I could find no 'human nature' material on the need to eat, for water, for excretion, and bodily structure and the resulting constraints for example on movements.

Wilson has little feeling for evolution in response to other evolutions: But especially after, on his only diagram, band, tribe, chiefdom, then the complete absence of possibilities of co-operation and parasitism and exploitation, which language and information make possible in a way no other animal can rival. Wilson seems to have no feeling for the astronomical range of possible combinations: An interesting omission is crypsis , not of menstruating women, but of all types of human interaction.

Consider for example secrecy of exams: Consider secret family courts.

Catherine Sauret

More broadly, consider promises, treaties, contracts, secret clauses e. Many examples of crypsis involve time: Debts become due, information on populations can be secret. If minds could be read, social relationships would presumably be very different indeed. But Jews avoid discussions on these lines for reasons obvious enough to them: Darwinism has been explained as a 19th century projection of 'capitalism' and struggles for money into the natural world.

I suspect his list comes indirectly from Talmudic sources, but adjusted to look less menacing. Wilson's list looks different from chastity, temperance, charity, diligence, patience, kindness, and humility. And different from possessive versus creative impulses, impulses versus conscious purpose, and vanity and love of possession, love of family, love of country.

And different from prior patriotism and heroism and glory. As with Lewis Fry Richardson's attempts to identify what might make ideals, probably there's some cryptic rationale in Wilson's chapters. The complete absence of discussion on intelligence and skills must be significant!

Skimming through, we find Aaron Director's Law is that 'income in a society is distributed to the benefit of the class that controls the government. In the USA this is of course the middle class. We find Wilson expects computers with 'the memory capacity of a human being' despite the fact memory is not understood. We find he doesn't seem to know that in Islam, often enough many sons went to war with each other. Looking online, we might puzzle over his photos: And we find a talk on TED in —how we really must do something about greenhouse gases. Human nature appears to be variable; it may take a long time to understand people—after all, most people can't understand Jews.

Nor do most people understand media propaganda. I haven't reviewed Gunnar Myrdal's book presumably the author was chosen on the same crypsis principle that 'Haagen Dazs' sounded good to Americans. However, here's a British equivalent, Rose and other Jews: Here's a book on British social workers, showing the fraudulent policies used to push the Jewish agenda: Anti-Racist Social Work part of the whole process of censoring out lack of achievements by low-IQ blacks and others.

On Jews forcing immigration into white countries, K. MacDonald's Culture of Critique has almost achieved the status of a classic. Conway's Demographic History of Britain is a counter to the lies of Jewish journalists. The use of bogus human rights legislation it of course doesn't apply to victims of wars Grayling: The abolition of capital punishment as a fake: Hanged by the Neck. Hilaire Belloc's The Jews is a s book surveying Jews in an objective way. However, like almost all commentators, Belloc excludes 'Jewish' writings: Hoffmann II is the only other serious researcher known to me.

Bertrand Russell's War Crimes in Vietnam is an introduction to post Jewish methods, though Russell was a lifelong dupe of Jews , as are a great many modern 'thinkers'. On the crypsis of lies and deception, here's a review of Noam Chomsky's Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda , in which Chomsky, the old fraud, omits vast structures of lies. But Flaherty's slogan omits 'No Jews'. Flaherty has a Youtube presence. Non-USA viewers must be amused at the heavily made-up actors pretending to do news.

Flaherty's hit rates rarely go above a few thousand. Many readers here are aware of Jewish anti-white policies. I'm just watching an episode of 'Midsomer Murders' showing two black 'folk singers' in an English village; and a film with an elderly actress with a deliberate working class voice being faced with a black doctor claiming to be English.

The Jewish news never states that blacks have robbed, shot, stolen from, or played the 'knockout game' on whites. Flaherty makes a good case for this systematic deception: It applies in Jewish reports on South Africa, in Muslim sex crimes in Britain, and generally any white country. Flaherty makes a good case; some or many—hard to know of his fans find this new, and are shocked.

Flaherty seems determined to make money from this; hence his second book, Don't Make the Black Kids Angry , which as I write is dated for publication in March ; easy enough to guess the contents. Flaherty doesn't say that Jewish control of paper money by the 'Federal Reserve' scam means Jews own all black cheap housing. So blacks, all their lives, pay rent to these bloodsucking parasites. Maybe he'll say that in future books, though I doubt it. And of course Flaherty doesn't mention violence by US mercenaries overseas. So—difficult situation for whites, who'd prefer not to be burdened with blacks and Jews.

Flaherty plays a small part in this drama. As he said, in roughly his own words, in one of his youtube comments, in my grade I don't look at that. And the other thing he doesn't look at—US violence overseas—is conducted by Jews, too. From his websites, I notice his brother died in Vietnam in Some of these people have reunions.

Flaherty has no idea of white violence and the way it's been controlled. The Formation of the National Government Published by Croom Helm.

A book I found in my search for titles including the word 'myth'. Humphry Berkeley was from to a Conservative Member of Parliament.

He is currently writing a biography of Sir Harold Wilson. The jacket blurbs say: No figure in the Labour movement has attracted such extremes of emotion as has James Ramsay MacDonald. This book provides an answer to the charge that MacDonald deliberately and cynically betrayed the Labour movement by forming the National Government with the Conservative and Liberal Parties.

Berkeley's book uses private papers, biographies and autobiographies; and cabinet minutes for 12th to 24th August He's a parliamentarian, not able to see the money and war policies behind the personalities—Balfour, Lloyd George, Chamberlain, Churchill and others make their stage appearances. And who could seriously embark on a biography of Harold Wilson? Berkeley regards the unemployment crisis as financially-based: Montagu Norman [of the Bank of England] was The latter made French participation a condition The French not only put economic pressure on Germany but withdrew large sums in gold from London The German banks were forced to repudiate their liabilities by declaring a moratorium.

They had borrowed short-term and lent long-term. Berkeley either didn't know, or wouldn't admit, the Jewish interests in the Fed, the Bank of England, the Banque de France. Or of course the USSR; and other countries. As a result he never asks, or answers, where the flows of gold went and how employment was manipulated internationally. A typical failed book; Perhaps a shrewd reader can penetrate its surface and identify the subterranean currents.

This is not my review. Published by Penguin Books Fake pacifist Jewish-concern book, which misled many peace-inclined people. Part of the Jewish propaganda for war with Germany. This review is part of a detailed piece on Jewish book propaganda Not the press, not the BBC radio, not public meetings.

Jewish Book Propaganda This is an interesting but strange book; and it's not very easy to state what its point is. Is it to help budding entrepreneurs? I'd say no, and I'll explain why, in detail, below. Is it for entertainment, 'Adventures of a Global Entrepreneur', a rousing evangelical call to would-be entrepreneurs? There are of course entertaining passages, and the title itself is in Branson's serial policy of hinting at sex, but that cannot be the whole point of this book.

Is it to pinpoint and identify business opportunities, for experienced entrepreneurs? Again, I'd say no, even more emphatically.

Is it to make some money? I can find no 'fastseller' information on his book titles; he's written a few more books since, which appear to be more of the same; and it must surely be true they netted far more than most authors. But the conclusion I arrived at is that Branson is at the limit of his business powers, and is discreetly nudging at the doors of powerful political and economic interests, with the emphasis on propaganda and promotion. This is the only hostile book on Branson I'm aware of; and none of the people who 'worked closely with Sir Richard' are acknowledged, apparently on legal advice.

About half Bower's books were conventional treatments of the 'Nazis', so truth can be assumed not to be his Bauer's? I found the book oddly insubstantial; this may be because of the impenetrability of business arrangements. But we find, in no special order, Losing My Virginity was a 'volley of tripe'. The Branson family was partly entangled with Flindt, from Hamburg, who worked on the Baltic Exchange i.

Branson in pursuit of publicity spoke to 'only the most susceptible' of journalists—as though the entire Jewish media system isn't solidly rigged anyway. I was interested to see a list of writs in the index, both to and from, including one from Mike Oldfield. Bower is irritated by Virgin's one-time hippiesque policy of low wages, seemingly unaware that if I'd read this correctly Branson's mum gave him the run of a big house in Kensington, which could count as subsidised rent to the Student -floggers.

Branson is quoted as complaining about legal costs; this may be news to Bower, but Branson was not and is not the only one! On condoms, made for Branson by a US manufacture with an eye on the UK market in ish, and 'AIDS', p 80 Bower thought Branson's claims should have been 'more cautious'—when apocalyptic claims were official government policy.

There are personal stories: However, after all, McCarthy was an adult. And p Abbott's suicide apparently disappointed by both his ex and Branson. We're told Abbott held shares, and knew secrets he would not have wanted to reveal; and Branson refused to buy back shares—possibly analogously to Jews dumping their fiat paper money for real assets.

An aspect of Branson on trains and aircraft, not really addressed by Bower, is the apparent over-reaction to Branson: Bower gives figures for numbers of air passengers in the late s but not their revenue and Virgin seems small beer. The implications of being a 'private company', i. Branson was born in , mnemonically helpful: Here's a quick overview but each chapter is a bitty mixture: Largely about Virgin Records, which started in about I haven't seen a full list of Virgin companies; there must be many, complicated by the removal of the name when sold.

Branson quotes 'my friend Jon Butcher' on capitalism. Branson has no idea about control of money itself. He doesn't seem to know Victorian India had railways, and Japan was industrialised by the s, and so on. Or that vast populations in for example Bangla Desh live in acute poverty, at least by white standards. Moreover he has no idea about science and technology. Anyway, the overt message of this chapter seems aimed at managers rather than entrepreneurs: Flying the Flag Basically this chapter is about the Virgin brand: Since Virgin is a private company, it's about self-publicity and it's undeniable that Branson is a master at that.

There's a story that, when a hot-air balloon crashed, he was immediately on his mobile, explaining the near-death circumstances. This means some compromise: Much of this is annoyingly vague: So far we've enjoyed success in [list of countries] Special Delivery This is a rather baffling, and long, chapter: But many of Branson's examples seem incomplete successes, or just hard to assess: In , his hundred or so Virgin record stores were 'deserted in weekdays' and his Virgin Megastores were not profitable.

And seems to think in a world of precise automated chemical analysis that Coca Cola's formula is secret. Some of this chapter looks at Branson's non-deliveries: I was amused p with his comparison of his life with playing the board game Monopoly , because he got all the details wrong, including 'borrowing from the bank to pay for everything'. And amused by this: Damage Report This is mostly two parts: And Branson's youthful indiscretion, avoiding purchase tax of the time.

All the material is from Branson's own life, rather breathtakingly egotistical! A Driver for Business As far as I can deduce, Branson was not an innovator; but he perfectly legitimately followed the expensive pathbreakers. This seems an exploratory chapter: Branson admires Google, rather than all the underlying work that made it possible. He regrets not originating Apple's iPod. He discussed human colonies on Mars, with Sergey and Larry of Google.

I would guess they viewed him as a gullible goy. Anyway, they discussed 'suborbital space', kilometres up I think, for which Branson thinks people will pay Virgin Galactic quite a lot of money. Look at say a billiard ball to see how unimpressive this is. Branson's claim in this chapter to innovation is the design of upper-class plane suites; some sort of bed in a plane.

Then we have 'biofuel' from fermented plant waste. Cars in the US used alcohol from , says Branson; could this have been part of the reason for prohibition? Was the oil lobby involved? Anyway, Branson calls tourism an 'industry'. And it occurs to me that maybe Africa had appropriate technology, all along—kraals, spears, cattle, manioc, transport on foot? Branson likes Dragon's Den and American Inventor and similar TV things; in fact, he has his own venture capital organisation, to assess possible inventions.

Most of them are rejected. I remember talking to an inventor, who told me in anguish of some official US outfit that had never, ever, paid out money to an inventor. Another, non-innovative, remark from Branson was that the 'ageing of the 'baby boomer' generation Holding On and Letting Go Another chapter with contents ludicrously unrelated to the chapter title: There's some material on Mandela, 'one important figure in my life', presumably supposed to be a leader.

Southern, and in fact all, Africa has problems, possibly insoluble. It's nice to know Branson did his bit to help 'one of South Africa's biggest health clubs'. And that just two 'whites', Peter Gabriel and Branson, were at some black celebration; possibly part of the Jewish push to destroy South Africa. And that twelve 'elders', along with 'leading conflict and dispute resolution professionals', were helping the world; we've all heard their wise words and well thought-out plans, haven't we.

And there's a 'declaration of war on AIDS'. And praise for Freddy Laker, whose mini air business lasted five years, before he retired with six million of some currency. Just Business Here we have: I think he must have been found unconvincing, as actors etc continue to be wheeled out to front this fraud.

There's a small mention of biochar , though not by name. There's a 'Stern Review' with not much detail. Spare a thought for Gates, richer than almost everyone he meets: What is to be made of this book? Firstly, the subtitle 'Business Stripped Bare' doesn't represent the contents accurately.

Are You an Author?

Business remains very much muffled up. There are no simplifications, overviews, summaries or details, even of his own businesses. There is nothing even on simple costs: Was Virgin Wine 'Life's too short for boring wine' hugely profitable? What's the arithmetic of a well-maintained aircraft fleet? And there's also nothing on the complications of juggling absurdly unequal power blocs: What's his recommended way to make alliances? What does he put in his exit strategies? Let's try to infer more The first issue of Student has photos of its undated and unpriced cover online, thanks to the wonders of Internet.

In other words, pretty much nothing to do with students, but everything to do with copying Sunday newspaper colour supplements, which were about five years old then. Presumably therefore a black and white, low budget, copy of an established business. He turned up aged 18 at Grosvenor Square, at a demonstration against the Americans in Vietnam.

Or at least I presume it was: Branson and Tariq Ali were interviewed and photographed: No tricky questions on atrocities, or on who was profiting. Maybe Branson found out later? Branson's family says Tom Bower were connected with Flindts from Germany, suggesting the common enough pattern of Jews tangling into British upper class I think in Branson's case legal circles. His family background no doubt involved family trusts, legal information and advice, and tax dodging—the private company, and separate legal structures and branches doing different deals in different jurisdictions, and different types of shares and capital, must have formed part of his background, just as other families might be medical or political or council estate.

Unfortunately, Branson says nothing on these topics, or nothing that I could find. It seems likely enough his mental life is dominated by companies and management, supplemented by expert s. Suggestions of lack of education and innumeracy, and dyslexia flicker around Branson; and after all his formal education never really started. Paradoxically, this could be a strength: Moreover such people are forced to delegate; they have no option. He used a magazine designer, his recording studio was designed by others, and so on. On the other hand, it can of course be a weakness and lead to mistakes: Exit strategies, in contracts, are part of Branson's Modus operandi and I've read of several varieties.

One is the exit strategy for a company: Flotation on a stock market e. However, he seems to have exit strategies for individuals, a bit like a pre-nuptial agreement. This makes perfect sense, since things change and develop but it sounds difficult. Everything may pivot on one sentence or one word. Branson is said to have got his wife to sign a non-disclosure agreement or something similar; and I'd guess his exit contracts include clauses not to reveal anything. Just as many job contracts debar ex-employees or partners from setting up similar businesses in similar areas.

Something analogous is splitting companies: Il y a une vraie synchronisation images et son. Et non, car la salle sonne bien. Pour la saison prochaine Faisons la Reine des neiges 2. Et enfin mais surtout Robert: Merci, on vous aime. En tout cas, prochain rendez-vous avec la musique Disney: Sortie le 5 mars Sherman ainsi que certaines chansons originales du film de Le livret contient aussi une note liminaire de Randy Thornton, producteur de la restauration et de la compilation.

Enfin, si vous voulez patienter intelligemment jusqu'au 5 mars, je vous conseille la lecture de "Mary Poppins, she wrote. The Life of P. Sortie de l'album We Love Disney. Enfin, je voulais corriger quelques erreurs du livret, eh oui… Je chipote! Enfin, trois phrases me semblent incorrectes. Inutile de rechercher sur internet, on trouve les deux versions et en plus, chansons-disney.

Tiana chante bien "Mais j'atteins le sommet"! Sortie de la bande originale du film La Reine des neiges. Vraiment un bel objet en tout cas. Tout est simple ici, tout va de soi. Comment se sont faits les choix des morceaux? Je trouve cela fascinant: Vous dirigerez l'orchestre national de Lyon. J'ai une collaboration de longue date avec l'Orchestre national de Lyon. Paris, 2 juillet Il cherchait un compositeur. Il est venu chez moi. La Petite boutique des horreurs nous avait mis au centre des attentions. Disney souhaitait renouveler le genre.

Belle entre dans le village. Trois chansons sur cinq donc et au final deux Oscars [meilleure chanson et meilleure musique originale]. On reprend les anciennes chansons dans le musical. Je lui ai dit: La chanson traduit le tic-tac de la pendule, du temps qui passe. La chanson pour le film durait 9 minutes. Avec tout ce temps, il serait mort! Yoni Amar est ravi: Et quand je suis sorti, je me suis dit: Rencontre exclusive avec Dimitri Granovsky.

Sortie le 1er juillet Et puis en marchant, on apprend. SR [8 novembre ]. Notes liminaires de Jeff Bond: Jeff Bond, 9 janvier Dans Taram et le chaudron magique , nous avons un amalgame de tous les merveilleux styles musicaux de M. Heureusement pour nous, le morceau existe encore. Randy Thornton, producteur, 12 janvier Extrait et traduction exclusifs pour les lecteurs de chansons-disney.

Ils parlent en coulisses. Au cours du brainstorming, ils discutent des grands moments de l'histoire. Je pense que c'est vraiment essentiel pour lui. Ca paraissait tellement en dehors de ce qu'ils avaient fait avant. L'une s'appelait Les chants de la Virginia Company , une collection de chants marins anglais qu'il partagea avec Menken. Comment pouvons-nous la lancer? Pocahontas sera exactement ce que vous attendez: Carol de Giere, Defying Gravity: Un seul livre retrace l'extraordinaire saga de ce projet hors norme: Pourquoi les dirigeants de Disney ont-ils choisi la France?

Des chapitres tous plus passionnants les uns que les autres Achetez le livre "Disney et la France" au prix exceptionnel de 29,45 euros livraison gratuite en cliquant ici: En achetant par le biais de la boutique chansons-disney. Le mouvement est vivant, la musique est un mouvement. Comment mieux percevoir cette puissance que d'y participer? Randy Thornton de Walt Disney Records ajoute: Ca fait vraiment poussiereux! Bref, c'est faire beaucoup de bruit pour pas grand chose!

Ce sont de beaux objets mais creux: Le film est volontairement kitsch: Et puis finalement, changement de cap! Le meilleur de Disney: Et ce pour plusieurs raisons. Le pire de Disney: Que reste-t-il donc du conte Raiponce? Disney reprend tel quel un seul passage: Rien de cela chez Disney. Quelle lamentable incursion au pays de la fantaisie. Pas de bande originale du film en CD! Jamais je n'acheterai la BO enn mp3. Une pochette de, de quoi d'ailleurs? Je sais ce n'est pas raisonnable, mais tant pis! Cet excellent film retrace la saga de la Walt Disney Company entre et En DVD, le 30 novembre Pour en savoir plus: Hischak et Mark A.

Bref, quelque chose de moins plat. Scarecrow Press 28 juillet A part China Moses et Anthony Khavanagh N'y a-t-il donc pas assez de chanteurs d'origine africaine en France? Disney France ne semble avoir pris aucun risque et c'est bien dommage! Ci-dessus, Roy Disney et Michael Eisner. Disney et Edna Francis Disney.

Paris, samedi 10 octobre

• Just in Time! Baptism Services, Sermons, and Prayers
• Theres An Angel in Las Vegas
• Diary of a Painted Lady
• Sin of the Past
• COULEURS DE PROVENCE TOME1 CENTRE VAR (French Edition)